Greebo said:
An intriguing idea, and these files aren't all that big.
I haven't done anything with bittorrent before - playing catchup now reading about it. We'd have to manually update our feeds, I presume, with fresh downloads from the FAA?
I'd have to read up on the server side issues of bittorrent, too. I've used it a bunch as client to get and share stuff like linux distros and podcasts. The home site is the author Bram Cohen's:
http://www.bittorrent.com/ Interesting guy. He has a mild form of Asberger's Syndrome, a form of autism, which lets him concentrate on tough problems.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.01/bittorrent.html?pg=1&topic=bittorrent&topic_set=
http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php?name=Articles&pa=showpage&pid=98
Reading what he says about Asberger's, I think I may have it, too. |-{)
AFAIK, hosting the tracker of a popular and large file can be a bandwidth issue, not because of the file but because everybody is checking and updating the tracker so they can find each other. The new trackerless clients take the heat off of the tracker server. As I said, most of those issues are not going to be ours because we'll be hosting neither large or popular files.
In order to get them from the FAA we'd have to subscribe to get the data on CD, which I think the last time I looked is $169 per.
What bittorrent will do is take the FTP heat off of pilotage.com, which they are asking client to cooperate with. With FTP every download comes from them to the client in real time, so they have to provide file size x number of clients in bandwidth. With BitTorrent each client will offer to upload whatever parts of the file they have so the server only has to help them get talking to each other.
I was planning on leeching (once, off hours) from pilotage.com as long as THEY are springing for the subscription. We would contact them for permission and see if they're interested in participating in the torrent.