AeroNav's Digital Charts Pricing

pcorman

Pre-takeoff checklist
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
158
Location
Paso Robles
Display Name

Display name:
Phil Corman
Found this article in this month's California Pilots Association Newsletter.
The entire article can be found at: http://calpilots.org/newsletters/Jan-Feb 2012.pdf. I'm pretty concerned about this unrealistic business model.

The FAA's AeroNav charting division told vendors this week that it proposes to
charge end users of digital charting producers about $150 a year to close a $5 million shortfall in its budget due to declining paper chart sales. The new fee, if adopted, would presumably more than double the cost of some popular iPad and Droid applications such as ForeFlight and WingX. Plus, vendors selling through Apple's application channels would face additional charges. "To me, it's pretty clear that these prices are a nonstarter. I know pilots aren't going to pay $150 for these products without screaming about it," one vendor told us. And because AeroNav's incremental pricing favors large-volume vendors over smaller ones, the pricing change may effectively kill smaller application writers and/or free sites that offer FAA charting products as a convenience for users. That might include DUATs contractors, which offer free charts on the two sites. Moreover, the FAA told about 70 vendors that as paper sales continue to decline, the FAA charges for digital charting products are likely to increase in order to cover fixed overhead costs. The agency also assured the vendors that it would not be developing any apps or other products to compete with them.
 
This may be a re-hash of their earlier position.

They already have the d-TPP product that is a approach-plate-only EFB application for Windows. It's not very sophisticated but I like it. It does just what it claims to do and does it well.

Like the whole LightSquared thing, there's a long way to go yet before the fat lady sings in this particular opera.
 
Did you notice?

Senators Rein In AeroNav's Fee Proposal

The powerful Senate Appropriations Committee has rapped the knuckles of the FAA over its handling of proposed changes to the delivery of online navigation information services and suggested more congressional oversight on the implementation of those changes. The committee, whose report must be approved by the full Senate and House, says AeroNav, the arm of the agency that publishes navigation and airport information, should immediately restore the 17-day advance availability of the next iteration of online publications, which it abruptly reduced to 24 hours last year. The change made it difficult if not impossible for third-party online navigation information providers to fully update their data bases before the effective dates of the new charts. "The committee is concerned that these changes may conflict with the FAA's mission to provide timely and accurate information for pilots in the interest of safe and efficient navigation," the committee said. It also warned against using online products as a cash cow to make up for lost revenue from diminishing paper chart sales.
 
Thank you, Peggy.
 
Did you notice?

Senators Rein In AeroNav's Fee Proposal

The powerful Senate Appropriations Committee has rapped the knuckles of the FAA over its handling of proposed changes to the delivery of online navigation information services and suggested more congressional oversight on the implementation of those changes. The committee, whose report must be approved by the full Senate and House, says AeroNav, the arm of the agency that publishes navigation and airport information, should immediately restore the 17-day advance availability of the next iteration of online publications, which it abruptly reduced to 24 hours last year. The change made it difficult if not impossible for third-party online navigation information providers to fully update their data bases before the effective dates of the new charts. "The committee is concerned that these changes may conflict with the FAA's mission to provide timely and accurate information for pilots in the interest of safe and efficient navigation," the committee said. It also warned against using online products as a cash cow to make up for lost revenue from diminishing paper chart sales.

Excellent.
 
They don't always have the best reputation, on the whole, but Congress sometimes does something right!
 
Yes! Someone is listening! I'm pretty sure we can thank all the vendors and developers for doing a bunch of ear-bending...
 
In all their wisdom,

Tougher, brighter stock coming to FAA charts

falling demand, distribution problems and the transition to electronic charts.

Trying to contain costs does not seem to be high on the priority list.

This would have been a great idea twenty years ago when NOAA started doing it for marine charts.
 
Back
Top