Not knowledgeable at all on the subject, but had a question. Is it wise/unwise legal/unlegal to do aerobatics in a 7AC?
Legal, unless you exceed the 129 mph Vne. Has more to do with the certification process back then than any guarantee of suitability.
Unwise, unless you know the airplane intimately (maintenance and history-wise) and know it to be sound, and are competent to do aerobatics yourself.
Jim
Thanks. Not that I was going to hop into a Champ and start doing weird stuff, but I was just curious.
You're welcome! Aerobatics isn't 'weird stuff'...it's controlling the airplane thru the entire envelope IMHO YMMV
There are people who, when they were young and stupid, bought a Champ, rebuilt it, and did more things than they were qualified to do in it...and lived to post on POA. I've heard... from folks
Jim
HAHA...dually noted. I was just curious because at the place I rent my plane from, the 7AC is 88/hr, while the EA-200 is 300/hr...
Not knowledgeable at all on the subject, but had a question. Is it wise/unwise legal/unlegal to do aerobatics in a 7AC?
Ya wearin a chute???
The Champ is approved for certain aerobatic maneuvers, which I have listed below from an L-16 manual. The L-16 is a 85 or 90 hp Champ, but it's still not a Citabria.
That being said,....
Respectfully disagree on a minor point....I think there are two differences between a 7AC and an L-16. The L-16 actually has a manual, and that manual lists additional limitations. The L-16A was actually a 7BCM Champ, and the L-16B a 7CCM.
IIRC the only limitation on the 7AC's I've had over the years were placards on the instrument panel that said 'never exceed 129 mph at any time'. Have never seen a manual for a Champ. Our Citabria, OTOH has additional placards detailing the approved maneuvers.
...that said, I've been wrong before, so you ain't gettin' no cherry, and I'm always willing to learn
I agree completely with everything else you said, and second it.
Jim
IIRC the only limitation on the 7AC's I've had over the years were placards on the instrument panel that said 'never exceed 129 mph at any time'. Have never seen a manual for a Champ.
Yep, it's like the J-3 and lots of planes of that era - no manual, hence no "approved" or "prohibited" maneuvers. Anyone who's ever seen a flying farmer act has seen a stock J-3 do loops and rolls. You just don't see the Champ doing the flying farmer thing because it's just a little more porky than the J-3, doesn't have quite such a floaty wing, and has even doggier ailerons.
The Champ is approved for certain aerobatic maneuvers, which I have listed below from an L-16 manual. The L-16 is a 85 or 90 hp Champ, but it's still not a Citabria.
That being said,....
Respectfully disagree on a minor point....I think there are two differences between a 7AC and an L-16. The L-16 actually has a manual, and that manual lists additional limitations. The L-16A was actually a 7BCM Champ, and the L-16B a 7CCM.
IIRC the only limitation on the 7AC's I've had over the years were placards on the instrument panel that said 'never exceed 129 mph at any time'. Have never seen a manual for a Champ. Our Citabria, OTOH has additional placards detailing the approved maneuvers.
...that said, I've been wrong before, so you ain't gettin' no cherry, and I'm always willing to learn
I agree completely with everything else you said, and second it.
Jim
Yes Jim, I agree, the Champ, meaning a 7AC is different from an L-16A or L-16B, but, they can all be considered Champs in the general context. The L-16's HP is different and they have some minor structural differences too, and like you said, there has never been an aircraft manual published for the 7AC.
I guess I just used the generic term "Champ" and should have used 7AC instead.
Yes Jim, I agree, the Champ, meaning a 7AC is different from an L-16A or L-16B, but, they can all be considered Champs in the general context. The L-16's HP is different and they have some minor structural differences too, and like you said, there has never been an aircraft manual published for the 7AC.
I guess I just used the generic term "Champ" and should have used 7AC instead.
Again, we agree. I suspect that when the changes were made to the airframe (engine swap, diagonal bracing between station 1 and 2, and large dorsal fin, from memory) for the L-birds, they did some additional structural analysis that said, "If you do that, it will hurt"...thus the aerobatics limitations. Interestingly enough, and you probaby know, the 7AC all the way thru the 7KCAB (150 hp with inverted systems) all share type cert A-759.
...and with that, I've probably gone from trivial to tedious! Thanks!
Jim
Again, we agree. I suspect that when the changes were made to the airframe (engine swap, diagonal bracing between station 1 and 2, and large dorsal fin, from memory) for the L-birds, they did some additional structural analysis that said, "If you do that, it will hurt"...thus the aerobatics limitations. Interestingly enough, and you probaby know, the 7AC all the way thru the 7KCAB (150 hp with inverted systems) all share type cert A-759.
...and with that, I've probably gone from trivial to tedious! Thanks!
Jim
Great info.... POA is full of knowledge...
Great info.... POA is full of knowledge...
Thanks, Ben....now if I could just remember what I had for breakfast
Jim