Too many nasty personal attacks on his way of providing answers to posters, and lack of support by the forum administrators.
Sounds more lopsided than it was.
He really didn't have to take the attitude that he was always right on everything and reference mystery FAA friends constantly as references.
(Hell I learned and researched more about internal FAA bureaucracy just by reading about what the hell "AFS" is, just because he referenced it so often. Hahahaha.)
But some folks here really did take him to task for it.
Most of us just respected his opinion without him having to play like it was the only possible one out there. He had some weird need todo that at times. The "CFI" after his name was plenty for me.
He brought about some of his own misery, I thought. Just my personal opinion.
I personally also wouldn't have any misguided expectations of those running the site as personal defenders if I were creating my own trouble like that.
It's populist lately to leave this place in a huff to garner the most possible needless drama or make up stuff about how lovely everything was just a little way in the past, where it was all unicorns farting rainbows. Haha.
The other problem with message board answers is that it's rare anyone thanks anyone for their input. I probably never told him I liked a lot of his stuff because I felt no need. Just read it and nod and keep scrolling. That's kinda how message boards work.
So hey, while I've got the chance... I really like a lot of your posts too! Probably scrolled past a hundred of them nodding along silently...