Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Wouldn't you need some indication the gauge was faulty prior to spending the customer's money?
Oil Pressure
- Thread starter Tom-D
- Start date
- Status
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
I once had an oil pressure gauge fail on me....bout 1 hr into a new engine run. Circled and landed ASAP....shut down...collected my thoughts....and took it back to Landmark. 
I demanded a new engine....but alls I got was a rebuilt gauge.
I demanded a new engine....but alls I got was a rebuilt gauge.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
No pressure from 2 engines is some indication
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
I was not hired to trouble shoot, I was here to change an engine, I simply never saw the old engine run.No pressure from 2 engines is some indication
when I got here the mags were freshly overhauled awaiting installation on the new engine. So the old engine was not able to be run.
The first time I saw the gauge was inop, was first run of the new engine.
So don't imply I should have known.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
I just wonder how many of you who seem to look for anything at all to rag Tom about, have ever met him?
I thought that I explained the situation pretty well. There were multiple reasons for replacing the engine. I bought an engine from Tom and he came to Texas to hang it and to see his daughter while he was here. I pulled the mags and sent them off so they would be ready for him when he got here, so he was unable to run the old engine himself, but even if he had, he would have seen low oil pressure among many other maladies, and been talking to an owner who was ready to replace it for many good reasons. He did not decide to replace the engine. I made the decision and made it clear earlier in the thread the multiple reasons for that decision. So since I said I was ready to replace it, why would he bother to check the gauge first? When we started the engine and pressure was within limits, but not as high as expected, he put a known good gauge on it right away. We found out what was up and kept moving forward.
I have worked in the hangar with Tom for several days, helping wherever I could. Working with someone several days gives you the opportunity to get to know them personally, see how much skill and knowledge they have as well as learn what they are about. I also took him through the war bird museum, another opportunity to see his MASSIVE aircraft knowledge. He also is generous to those in need. I won’t go into it, but he did a significant part helping someone in need while he was here. He is not a permanent member of our airport community, but he pitched in with the rest of us as if he were. The guys at the airport have been duly impressed with him.
Tom is honest, hardworking and pleasant to be around. I think he started this thread just to have fun with it. At any rate I really just don’t understand why people rag on him here. He is a good resource and a great asset to any community. He is someone who is honest, fair dealing and I like to think I can call he and his lovely wife Barb our new friends.
Oh, and by the way, my little Cessna now has a solid, sweet running engine.
I thought that I explained the situation pretty well. There were multiple reasons for replacing the engine. I bought an engine from Tom and he came to Texas to hang it and to see his daughter while he was here. I pulled the mags and sent them off so they would be ready for him when he got here, so he was unable to run the old engine himself, but even if he had, he would have seen low oil pressure among many other maladies, and been talking to an owner who was ready to replace it for many good reasons. He did not decide to replace the engine. I made the decision and made it clear earlier in the thread the multiple reasons for that decision. So since I said I was ready to replace it, why would he bother to check the gauge first? When we started the engine and pressure was within limits, but not as high as expected, he put a known good gauge on it right away. We found out what was up and kept moving forward.
I have worked in the hangar with Tom for several days, helping wherever I could. Working with someone several days gives you the opportunity to get to know them personally, see how much skill and knowledge they have as well as learn what they are about. I also took him through the war bird museum, another opportunity to see his MASSIVE aircraft knowledge. He also is generous to those in need. I won’t go into it, but he did a significant part helping someone in need while he was here. He is not a permanent member of our airport community, but he pitched in with the rest of us as if he were. The guys at the airport have been duly impressed with him.
Tom is honest, hardworking and pleasant to be around. I think he started this thread just to have fun with it. At any rate I really just don’t understand why people rag on him here. He is a good resource and a great asset to any community. He is someone who is honest, fair dealing and I like to think I can call he and his lovely wife Barb our new friends.
Oh, and by the way, my little Cessna now has a solid, sweet running engine.
Last edited:
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
First engine had no pressure as per the customer. When someone tells me they observe no pressure, I don't immediately second-guess them. Second engine showed no pressure either. A couple of clues right there.
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
And that is when we put a direct reading gauge on it.
The first time I had reason to doubt the gauge.
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
How would prove the gauge on an engine that would not run?
My first opportunity was with the new engine.
So forget the 2 engine theory.
I took my customers word that it was low pressure on a very old engine.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Wasn't the first one direct reading too? They are generally Bourdon gauges, aren't they?
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Yeah, one is very old, the other is brand new.No pressure from 2 engines is some indication
I'll bet you are clariboyexnt and can just look at any engine and know the oil pressure running or not.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
It doesn't prove the gauge, by itself.
Quite frankly, while there are symptoms that would rule out the gauge, I'd be landing the plane before they would manifest themselves and so wouldn't be seen by the pilot (hopefully). Letting it go that long is a good way to make an emergency.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Why should engine age make a difference? And new engines could fail, too.
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Presumably, I don't take them apart to see.
The direct reading gauge is a known good gauge, hooked up by its self does not depend upon the same lines as the installed one.
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
We had no symptoms, the aircraft was not flying or able to be run.
The first time we could put pressure on the gauge was with the new engine
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
What do you mean by direct reading? The first one was also direct reading, in that it read the pressure directly through mechanical flexing of a tube, wasn't it?
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Do you understand wear?
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
I'm beginning to believe you don't understand basic A&P
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
It wouldn't be the first thing I would do, but a little pressure into the gauge would show nicely, even without an engine. Small air pump. So you could, in theory, put pressure on the gauge.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
Ya’ THINK! First of all, your characterization of “no pressure” is incorrect. It showed low pressure, but within Continental limits, barely.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
I asked a very simple question- how do you define direct reading? Your lack of communication skills are one cause of these "discussions". To my eyes, the original gauge was direct reading.
What wears in an engine to make the gauge inoperative?
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Have you ever seen a rebuilt engine fail to produce oil pressure?
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
This statement says you don't understand what pressure is.
Pressure is a resistance to flow, no resistance, no pressure.
old worn engines have no resistance
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
Good grief man! I have monitored this engine more closely than a lot of pilots I know. I flew the thing all over the place, recognized problems before emergencies and kept it in the air. I haven’t flown it at night since before it hit TBO. I replaced the engine to have a better chance of NOT dealing with an emergency. Geesh!
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Salty
Touchdown! Greaser!
You don’t see how the misrepresented facts in the OP could turn people off?
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Tom didn't bother to mention that, nor suggest otherwise in his replies.
My experiences are an extremely small sample, and are not representative of the population of rebuilt engines. I probably flew with maybe 2 rebuilt or new engines.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Was that so hard now?
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
No Tom, many people, even those who work on engines, don’t really understand oil pressure. I have seen people many times try to cure low oil pressure with an oil pump or shimming the relief valve as if it were a magic adjustment for a worn out engine. They have no clue that in almost all cases when the pressure goes down it means that the bearings and/or crankshaft have worn to excessive clearance which lets oil flow more freely rather than making resistance to flow that creates pressure.
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
You've done a great job of being safe and getting as much time as possible from your engine.
You simply became aware that you didn't trust the engine.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
You obviously don’t know how the gauge is installed. The gauge in the panel is a direct reading too. Tom just disconnected it and connected the known gauge to the same line which leads directly to the engine near the relief valve. IOW, the panel gauge IS a directly connected gauge.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
No, pressure is the force applied perpendicular to the surface on an object over an area where that force is distributed.
Hence the units PSI (pounds per square inch), newton per square meter, and so forth. I'm sitting in a room with no wind (flow), but the air pressure is 14.7 PSI.
What resistance does a new engine have?
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
Thank you! Yes I became aware when it was untrustworthy at the point at which it became untrustworthy.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Do you finally understand it?
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
Your question is not applicable. We are talking about OIL PRESSURE. As the bearings wear, the space between them opens, requiring less pressure to force oil through. Tee a guage on a water faucet and connect a hose with a variable opening valve on the other end. Watch the pressure as you gradually open the valve. As the flow increases the pressure will decrease. It’s not rocket science. If you were paying attention, you learned this in eight grade science class.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
It certainly is applicable. You and Tom seem to be defining pressure differently from the rest of the world. Pressure is a force applied perpendicular to a surface over an area. It doesn't matter what the source of the pressure may be. When you lean on a wall, you apply pressure.
Actually, no because your customer said the same thing I did and you didn't correct him. He said his original gauge was direct reading, too.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
He simply indicated low oil pressure when he wrote “no” oil pressure. Lots of people talk like this. They might say that their car is “out of gas” when it is actually low on gas.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
Good grief!
You’ve never taken a fluids class have you?
In the case of a fluid the pressure is applied perpendicular to all surfaces that contain it. Is there a college near you? It’s never to late to learn about such things.
I think Tom meant he connected it to the same line except in the engine compartment. In effect they are connected directly to the same point directly on the engine.
You’ve never taken a fluids class have you?
In the case of a fluid the pressure is applied perpendicular to all surfaces that contain it. Is there a college near you? It’s never to late to learn about such things.
I think Tom meant he connected it to the same line except in the engine compartment. In effect they are connected directly to the same point directly on the engine.
Cap'n Jack
Final Approach
Yes, that's exactly right. Air is a fluid too, and applies pressure all around us. What am I saying that is incorrect? You are merely restating what I said.
MBDiagMan
Final Approach
I just suppose I am more articulate with such subjects.
- Status