Recent content by pwiggins

And I bet most all agree that it's a good thing that the products keep being updated. It shows the product developers are actually listening to their customers. Plus many of the additional features make for safer flying. patrick :)

Hi Doc, The primary reason I went with WingX is the terrain feature. I live in Utah where the "cumulogranite" (as I like to call the mountains) get pretty high so when flying over them at night it's nice to know where they are. There are other fun little features I like but one of the new...

I've been using it for several months now. The thing that sold me on it vs. FF is the terrain feature. Nice to be able to know where the mountains are at night when you can't see them out the window. patrick Utah

Here's a look at the recent meeting the FAA held for software developers regarding the FAA's plans to start charging for electronic charting data. Personally since I use charts I don't have any objections to paying my fair share but it rather sounds like the FAA has not thought this through...

I can't speak to the georeference feature as I have not purchased it (yet). However, regarding having to manually scroll the map, I run Wing-X and the symbol of the plane stays put and the map moves under it. I *thought* it was the same with FF but we'll have to wait for a FF user to say for...

Re: iPad ??? (Terrain not important?) When I got my iPad I checked with my local avionics shop about software. The tech I spoke with has both Wing-X and Foreflight on his multiple iPads. I tried both programs but went with Wing-X because where I live (Utah) there are lots of mountains and...