What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled field

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sayrequest

Guest
I have heard the arguments, read more than a few papers and for me it boils down to a few things I have to get off my chest.
One is pattern entry at uncontrolled fields. I understand what the aim says and I agree. I understand that the 45 is a recommended procedure. I want to cover what others seem to think is acceptable procedure and share why it bothers me to see these cowboy pattern entries and procedures.
Lets start with the upwind or crosswind entry at 500 abv tpa. I have been in the pattern for several hours through out the day and had these cowboys fly in declaring upwind entry to runway 17 say. I am in the pattern with a student making radio calls on every corner of the pattern only to be completely surprised when I have just called my crosswind and some cowboy declares that he is on crosswind desceding to TPA. Yeah buddy, I am on the crosswind directly below you, 300 below tpa, and your going to do what? Think Top Gun when maverick says "I going to slam on the brakes and he'll fly right by", goose says your going to do what. Gutsiest move I ever saw, man.... anyway.....
Without debating the merits of the crosswind entry, a not so cute stunt, for all our sakes, make a few calls before you get there. I keep a running awareness of who is where and when and if I know you are coming I can accomodate you, no problem. We extend downwinds all the time to allow straight in instrument approaches or for stacked up departures to get out, prior to arrival. No problem. Follow the FEDex and UPS guys lead, notice they call several times prior to arrival, usually starting about 10 out. Makes it so easy. Being a pilot is not a secret agent thing. The goal is not to be silent and listen to everyone else, "Oh yeah I knew where you were" Yeah but, we want to know where you are as well. I have heard a million times from some some smug pilot "a radio call is not required," Yeah its not required, but if it doesn't overburden the frequency and you have a radio, use the darn thing.
A few more, for example, 45 Radio calls, I hear, X trafffic, cessna y, 45 left downwind. Which is it Left 45 or Downwind? Oh you meant to say on a 45 for a Left downwind? I almost always hear that call when the aircraft is making a teardrop type entry right on top of the downwind. A couple points. It's not really a 45 and why include both locations in the call? I understand the "on a 45 for a left downwind call", but isn't the logical conclusion of being on a left 45, a left downwind? Why wouldn't you just say x traffic, cessna y is on a 3 mile left 45, 17. Notice that it is quite clear that you are on a 45 and not a downwind, and that it is infinitely more helpful to me if I am on the crosswind as I know you are 3 out (I can extend upwind or start my cross). I won't wonder if the 45 you are talking about is an 8 mile 45 or the turning downwind instantaeously type of deal. As for the 45, when you are over the field, survey the scene and use the advantage of the altitude to select some ground references for your 45. For me 3 mile 45 is my minimum. I know you guys are way better, way cooler, you don't need that private pilot long 45.. I usually fly a 5 mile 45 if terrain allows. Try it, it gives you more time to pickup crosswind / patten traffic and more time for them to accomodate you. Also fly a real 45, if pattern entry dictates Southeast entry, don't curve in from 1 mile due east. It may seem counter intuitive but a long 45 is more professional and safer.
Also if you fly at a towered airport Right pattern is something ATC gives you because they control the airspace and are sitting in a tower with the sole job of separating traffic. See 91.126 for uncontrolled fields, says all turns to left unless otherwise established for airport. I have heard more than a couple people loudly declare on CTAF, "turning right base" on a left hand rwy and they weren't in helicopters, "avoiding the flow of fixed wing traffic". They are breaking a regulation and making a radio call about it. I always find that interesting, saw a King Air 300 guy do it last month. like, what are you thinking?
Also Position and Hold is an ATC thing that I see at uncontrolled fields. Some how, someone believes that the FAA's main concern over past decade "runway incursions" somehow is exempt if you do it on purpose at uncontrolled fields. It always ends when the guy who just landed misses the nearest turnoff that captain position and hold figured landing traffic should have made. Soon after, the silent downwind traffic now well on a base (The one you didn't see when you thought the faa hired you to be atc in your high wing, sitting at the end of the runway) tells you he's on base turning final. Even if the spacing does work out so that traffic clears the end of runway as you lift off and landing traffic flares, I think you guys should get some recurrency training. Also consider the potential go around situation that double upwind traffic creates.
Doesn't end there, gets better, consider the traffic that takes the runway and thinks that line checks or runway checks/ configurations should be handled on the runway. I came from one of the busiest airports in the country. Cleared for takeoff does not allow for delay. If you require delay you should say ready to go rwy x request short delay. Tower would have chewed you out for not requesting a stunt like that. Do you require a tiedown with that take off? They didn't clear you for takeoff with a 747 5 mile final at 180 knots so you could make sure your heading indicator lined up with runway heading and brief the merits of a short field takeoff. Hold short lines are where you get ready, not the runway. At uncontrolled fields you should do the same.. Just say taking rwy x with short delay. Not regulation, just courteous flying. I can then plan accordingly. I have been on downwind self announcing and had to go around after traffic remained on the runway while I moved around the pattern to base and then final.
For heavens sakes Most of what I am talking about assumes an attitude that these cowboys are the only ones in the sky. Lastly, I have read several things contrary to straight in traffic and I personally am fine with it. I expect 45 traffic and straight in traffic, doesnt bother me, I hate traffic in places that I don't expect to see it. Not that it relieves me from see and avoid, thats my job, I just don't think that traffic descending on me in crosswind, or people that think a 45 degree entry is a steep spiral to downwind is a good idea.
Today I was almost killed when an airplane rented at our FBO (with a radio) entered the downwind in stealth mode (not making calls) in a steep banking descending turn to downwind. I had called my takeoff with the intention of closed traffic, crosswind and downwind. He didn't maintain a listening watch, and I didn't hear or see a peep from him on CTAF untill he filled up my windscreen in a steep decending turn to downwind. He said he never saw me, newer pilot. Fine, but don't be offended when you come to my airport and I chew up some cowboy for pulling some stunt and compounding it with no radio calls. I don't care how big your airplane is or if you have 25,000 hours. I love flying but have no room for those who don't have regard for safety or courtesy in their flying. I look forward to your comments. I hope these things are not typical of your flying, if so get an instructor and ask them if I am all wet or maybe you aren't as safe a pilot as you thought you were.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Holy cow that is tough to read.

I've said it before: Your thousands of hours mean nothing to me, but your wisdom is strong in many ways. There are reasons people (including myself) enter patterns in a non-standard way, and they're perfectly legal and safe if done properly. While the 45 degree entry to the pattern is the AIM suggested, and preferred way, there are times when I'm perfectly lined up for a straight in, and I'll do it. There are also times that I will enter downwind from a "midfield crosswind." I always make sure I announce what I'm doing and I fit in with the flow when I do such non-standard entries.

Oh, and your radio pet peeves are understandable. There are quite a few things I hear pilots do that irk the hell out of me....like leaving off "left" or "right" when mentioning pattern directions. Some claim that a left pattern is standard, so its unnecessary, but for those of us that fly out of an airport with non-standard patterns, believe me, it is useful to hear that people are where they are supposed to be.

You should register an account. That is really the best way to post here, as it gives ya a persona, and the ability to post elsewhere, besides Lessons Learned and Medical Matters. Welcome to PoA!
 
Last edited:
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

...and believe me, your comments above will not harm your reputation with most of us.

Been there, done that, and have been the bad guy myself a time or two.

But I learned from it!
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I hear you and certainly agree with what you are saying. Calling ahead, listening watch and head on a swivel is essential to entering any non-controlled airport traffic pattern.

I do enter crosswind when coming from the opposite direction, but I call ahead, watch for traffic and yield to anyone established. No matter how one enters, there can be a conflict if one isn't looking, listening and yielding. Of course, someone without a radio can enter traffic.

I don't know if folks just don't realize how dangerous it can be, if they don't feel comfortable on the radio or if they're behind the aircraft, but I'm amazed at how many folks just don't do this in a safe and courteous manner. That being said, I have screwed up and had the incorrect frequency tuned in a couple times. When I see other traffic and don't hear it, it drives a need for me to cross check. Once, it was published incorrectly. Once, it was recently changed by NOTAM and I didn't get the local NOTAM. Seems several other folks didn't get the change either.

In any case, it's something we all sure work to do correctly and I appreciate your raising the issue again to get us all to focus.

Best,

Dave
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You certainly won't get any argument from me about the foolishness of descending into the traffic pattern, but I cannot for the life of me see any problem with upwind or crosswind entries provided you're established at TPA 2-3 miles outside the pattern.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You certainly won't get any argument from me about the foolishness of descending into the traffic pattern, but I cannot for the life of me see any problem with upwind or crosswind entries provided you're established at TPA 2-3 miles outside the pattern.

That's the only time I make crosswind entries... I've not made an upwind entry... I think it's just as easy to deviate to the side of the airport where the downwind leg takes place and set up to enter downwind on the 45.

OP, please register for an account - your points are well-received and echoed by many of us here. Sounds like you might be able to contribute to a lot of conversations here.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

JD lives?
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

trust no one
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

It would appear.

Nah--JD would have said...

"I was on downwind, and I called up my special forces friend. I got him to parachute in, and he got his way inside this bozo's airplane, and taught him how to fly a pattern. It turns it that he was on the run from the Marshall service, so I took him down with my 50G60 perfect XW landing..."

:-D
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Nah--JD would have said...

"I was on downwind, and I called up my special forces friend. I got him to parachute in, and he got his way inside this bozo's airplane, and taught him how to fly a pattern. It turns it that he was on the run from the Marshall service, so I took him down with my 50G60 perfect XW landing..."

:-D


Whaallll, given your perfect imitation of JD....





What are we to conclude?????
:goofy::goofy::goofy::goofy:
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You certainly won't get any argument from me about the foolishness of descending into the traffic pattern, but I cannot for the life of me see any problem with upwind or crosswind entries provided you're established at TPA 2-3 miles outside the pattern.
I demonstrated that exact maneuver on three of four students today. It doesn't help that the flippin' Indian students on the field fly such irregular patterns; including one idiot who did a left 360 on a left downwind. :rolleyes:

Given the words of the OP, I've gotta wonder where they might be located.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

kenny, do you just have a problem with indians? or do they just follow you all over the sky?
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

kenny, do you just have a problem with indians? or do they just follow you all over the sky?
Call just about any major school around the country. There WILL be Indian students. There may be some who cater to other international students but many have only Indians.

I have a problem with students who do not follow proper procedures. That in itself is not just Indians. It's a LOT of pilots who do not follow standards and practices. But, I've witnessed it at two separate schools and obviously those running the schools are not doing a d*mn thing to change it.

Today alone, I had one do the previously described left 360 in a left-hand pattern. Later, I had a student take off well before I entered the pattern. He was well ahead of me on downwind and suddenly abeam the numbers, he turns toward the runway then suddenly turns right away from the runway... all without saying a word on the radio.

They have come up to our FBO to buy something such as a flashlight but turn away when told the price. None of the six I flew with before had a flashlight.

If you really think I'm over-reacting, go visit a school and simply watch them. I'm not blowing smoke on this issue. With domestic students, you can and probably do turn away students who are performing either unsafely or not at all. You surely won't spend forever on them. The Indian students are not treated that way. As I said, the school I dealt with before... I found it to be nothing more than a ticket mill for international students.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Would you say that the school these students are associated doesn't necessarily train their students to be the Most Valuable Pilots that have received Aeronautical training? I ask because I've run into similar students from their other location in the Houston area.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Would you say that the school these students are associated doesn't necessarily train their students to be the Most Valuable Pilots that have received Aeronautical training? I ask because I've run into similar students from their other location in the Houston area.
PJ, You speak such truth! :)

Last night, I was doing landings with a student at Hooks. Both of us are looking at this guy landing and trying to figure out where he's going. He's well ahead of us and crossing the threshold. Between the time we turned base and was on short final, maybe a half mile out.... we watched this guy go from left of center to right of center thinking he was going into the grass then back to the center line. Then, it looks as if he's stopped on the runway. After that, it appears he's taxiing backward!!! Both Kurt and I were asking ourselves, "What the hell is he doing???" Obviously, we had to go around.

More than half of these students I see have no business learning to fly.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I agree... I cringe every time I hear their radio calls on the CTAF at EYQ, I don't even want to think about what it's like at an airport with multiple runways like CXO!

To their credit, I do have to say that some of their students show promise. One morning, my mentor and I met up at IWS to take his Bo up for a while. It was foggy, so we hung out in the FBO to wait out the clag. There were four students from this other school napping on the couches in the FBO. I talked to one guy who was awake, who told me that they are all building time for their CSEL tickets, so they had taken two planes to Dallas and back overnight. They were at IWS because the fog was too thick to get into EYQ. They were able to get in on the GPS approach to IWS. I thought it showed good judgement for them to go missed at EYQ and divert to wait until it was clear enough for them to get back.

I have to admit, I do like the paint scheme on that school's planes.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You make some interesting points, but doing this one...

They didn't clear you for takeoff with a 747 5 mile final at 180 knots so you could make sure your heading indicator lined up with runway heading

...would've saved many lives at Lexington, KY a couple years ago.


-Rich
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You make some interesting points, but doing this one...



...would've saved many lives at Lexington, KY a couple years ago.

You know what's really crazy? The plane is still there... Right where it was when i saw it just after the accident (I saw it again just a couple weeks ago). Either someone paid off the horse farm to keep it as a memorial, or... I dunno. I'm pretty sure that a blackened airplane isn't exactly a sought-after horse farm ornament.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

You know what's really crazy? The plane is still there... Right where it was when i saw it just after the accident (I saw it again just a couple weeks ago). Either someone paid off the horse farm to keep it as a memorial, or... I dunno. I'm pretty sure that a blackened airplane isn't exactly a sought-after horse farm ornament.

Okay, not the same plane.

Here's what I'm seeing:

http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=38.040715,-84.621238&spn=0.00143,0.002647&z=19

But here's what the plane actually looked like after the crash - Not enough left to even look like a blackened fuselage. :(

http://www.baaa-acro.com/Dossier Photo/N431CA.htm

More info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comair_Flight_5191
http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM2JGA

Steve suggests that it's being used for fire training, and I think he's right...

http://maps.google.com/maps?client=...fb=1&cid=12515434725607193237&li=lmd&z=14&t=m
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Okay, not the same plane.


Ya, that's definitely the fire training burn pit. Take a look at 42°21'14.66"N, 71° 0'15.41"W. Pretty much the same thing in Boston. I've seen them at a handful of other airports, too.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

SLC also has one.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I can't tell you how many times I've seen some guys flying straight in because they have no clue as to what pattern to fly... :dunno:
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I can't tell you how many times I've seen some guys flying straight in because they have no clue as to what pattern to fly... :dunno:
Ummm... maybe fly 500 feet above TPA and see what's happening. I'll leave it at that considering what's being argued in another thread which would be more appropriately argued here.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Ummm... maybe fly 500 feet above TPA and see what's happening.
A good idea, but check the A/FD first to find out if there's a second, higher, heavy/jet TPA so you stay 500 above the highest pattern. And don't descend into the pattern, either -- get clear, descend to TPA, and then enter.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

A good idea, but check the A/FD first to find out if there's a second, higher, heavy/jet TPA so you stay 500 above the highest pattern. And don't descend into the pattern, either -- get clear, descend to TPA, and then enter.
Ah yes... Agreed. They can go up to 2500 AGL so they've gotta be considered.

I do teach to cross over, go beyond by at least two miles and descend before turning on a 45 for entry.

We don't get too many of those mini mailing tubes in here right now while 14-32 is under reconstruction. But after that, Ric's types may invade us again. :)
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Ummm... maybe fly 500 feet above TPA and see what's happening. I'll leave it at that considering what's being argued in another thread which would be more appropriately argued here.

Y'know, I won't argue that this is taught a lot, but I can't find it in the AIM, and it seems to me that having every airplane fly over the field at the same altitude from a zillion random directions is about the most unsafe method of arriving at an airport that's possible. I used to do it when working on my private, but thinking about the possibilities gives me the heebiejeebies. Now, the only time I'll do it is if winds are likely to be highly variable (ie I won't already know roughly what they'll be from my weather briefing), and there's nobody in the pattern on the radio already (which would at least tell me what runway everyone else is using).
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Y'know, I won't argue that this is taught a lot, but I can't find it in the AIM, and it seems to me that having every airplane fly over the field at the same altitude from a zillion random directions is about the most unsafe method of arriving at an airport that's possible. I used to do it when working on my private, but thinking about the possibilities gives me the heebiejeebies. Now, the only time I'll do it is if winds are likely to be highly variable (ie I won't already know roughly what they'll be from my weather briefing), and there's nobody in the pattern on the radio already (which would at least tell me what runway everyone else is using).
Would you rather enter from inside the pattern? Perhaps fly an extra ten miles around the airport and then enter properly on downwind? I give up.

Read AC 90-66A
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Would you rather enter from inside the pattern? Perhaps fly an extra ten miles around the airport and then enter properly on downwind? I give up.

No... If I know where the winds are or I know the runway that's in use, I will reach pattern altitude 3-5 miles from the airport and enter the pattern directly, without the overflight-teardrop thing which is probably the most dangerous possible way to arrive at an airport.

Read AC 90-66A

Just did... And I found nothing stating that you should start by overflying the field 500 over TPA.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I can't tell you how many times I've seen some guys flying straight in because they have no clue as to what pattern to fly... :dunno:
So? I do it all the time. I know the pattern, but if I'm about lined up with final (which I almost always am), I'm doing the 10 NM straight in at 120 KIAS. People need to get used to it.

-Felix
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

So? I do it all the time. I know the pattern, but if I'm about lined up with final (which I almost always am), I'm doing the 10 NM straight in at 120 KIAS. People need to get used to it.

-Felix
That's the attitude! To hell with the standard established by airport managment!

:rolleyes:
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

People need to get used to it.

-Felix

Haaaa, the real reason... your ego doesn't fit in the pattern...:D
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

A straight-in approach is completely legal and completely safe when done properly. In many cases, it's the only good way to get to the runway -- you wouldn't want bizjets shooting the ILS to try to break off the approach and circle around to enter on the 45 with all the light traffic, would you? The 45-downwind entry is one, but only one, way to enter the pattern. As long as folks enter on a tangent and don't cut across the pattern or descend into it, entries from other directions can be done safely.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

A straight-in approach is completely legal and completely safe when done properly. In many cases, it's the only good way to get to the runway -- you wouldn't want bizjets shooting the ILS to try to break off the approach and circle around to enter on the 45 with all the light traffic, would you? The 45-downwind entry is one, but only one, way to enter the pattern. As long as folks enter on a tangent and don't cut across the pattern or descend into it, entries from other directions can be done safely.
I agree. It is the only good way for heavier aircraft. I think I said that somewhere earlier but lost track where.

But, for a smaller aircraft operating in VMC with aircraft already in the pattern, breaking off and re-entering in sequence is just a safer tactic.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

But, for a smaller aircraft operating in VMC with aircraft already in the pattern, breaking off and re-entering in sequence is just a safer tactic.
Why and how?
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

None of the six I flew with before had a flashlight.
I've flown almost all my night hours without a flashlight. I just generally don't have anything I want to see lit up.

When I was about 10 years old I used to fly around at night with my dad in a Kolb twinstar ultralight. Not a single light on the airplane and no maps or flash lights. It was beautiful. Very stupid..but I was 10 and didn't know any better.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

Why and how?
Given the volume of student traffic we have at Conroe flying non-standard patterns, wide patterns, taking off too soon or landing too soon behind someone... anything you can do to minimize risk is good. Entering from downwind on the standard 45 will give you that advantage much more so than any other.

I'm not saying it's that bad at every airport. But, it is at ours. I won't go into the reasons why.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I'm not saying it's that bad at every airport. But, it is at ours. I won't go into the reasons why.
It is absolutely amazing that every airport or FBO you've ever flown at houses the worst pilots in the world and requires extreme caution to stay alive. I feel for you. IME--99.99% of the airports I've flown to have fairly competent local pilots. Maybe I'm optimistic.
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

I've flown almost all my night hours without a flashlight. I just generally don't have anything I want to see lit up.

When I was about 10 years old I used to fly around at night with my dad in a Kolb twinstar ultralight. Not a single light on the airplane and no maps or flash lights. It was beautiful. Very stupid..but I was 10 and didn't know any better.
I'll go along with the last line as far as not being prepared for the worst scenario. But, if ya don't need lights in the cabin, ya don't need them. The other night, we had to keep cranking down the overhead red light as it was too bright. I agree with ya. My favorite time to fly is at night. I'll jump at the opportunity and practically for free. That's how much I enjoy being up there during those hours.

But, I'm also sure you wouldn't have been lighting up the cabin with white light just before you arrive in the traffic pattern. Have that one pulled on ya!
 
Re: What several thousand hours tells me about non standard entries at uncontrolled f

It is absolutely amazing that every airport or FBO you've ever flown at houses the worst pilots in the world and requires extreme caution to stay alive. I feel for you. IME--99.99% of the airports I've flown to have fairly competent local pilots. Maybe I'm optimistic.
It's not the "local" pilots that are the problem. The truly local guys who hang around our FBO are some dang good pilots; old timers who have a wealth of knowledge I'll be picking. The kind who will let ya fly their plane and they pay for it just because they love to fly. That's one of the things I love about this place. I envision that's what you grew up around. If so, I'm jealous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top