182 STOL jump plane killing my x-wind landings

flhrci

Final Approach
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
5,932
Location
Groveport, OH
Display Name

Display name:
David
I am in training to be a jump plane pilot. I have flown this 1962ish 182A with STOL kit and nothing but foam on the floor and one seat/set of controls in it twice now. This thing floats like a balloon during landing even with the slightest crosswind. The Chief pilot wants me to fly with him one more time in a 172 cause it is somewhat light in comparison to a regular 182) so I can get some crosswind practice.

This 182 makes me realize how some of us are lazy or spoiled in other planes that just kind of quit flying when touching the runway. This one wants to keep on going and the wing wants to come up on the upwind side real easy. It stalls under 40mph which is the lowest number on the ASI. I have never flown a plane this "light" before but the modifications allow 200 more lbs of payload.

Its good experience. I just need some more practice since I haven't gotten to fly much lately. At least they know I am a safe pilot and just need a little more work.


David
 
Last edited:
Sounds like another great option for an AOA indicator!
 
I agree about the approach speed in hindsight Greg. The Chief Pilot wants me to fly the plane 80mph through the whole pattern. I usually step down the speeds on each leg. He recommends two notches flaps on downwind also and no more. When we did a no-flap landing the week before last it was even floatier and faster. May jsut have to go back to doing it the way I usually do. The cockpit flows are ok at least.

David
 
I chuckled at 'chief pilot' and 'drop zone.' Does he even have a license?:goofy:
 
I am in training to be a jump plane pilot. I have flown this 1962ish 182A with STOL kit and nothing but foam on the floor and one seat/set of controls in it twice now. This thing floats like a balloon during landing even with the slightest crosswind. The Chief pilot wants me to fly with him one more time in a 172 cause it is somewhat light in comparison to a regular 182) so I can get some crosswind practice.

This 182 makes me realize how some of us are lazy or spoiled in other planes that just kind of quit flying when touching the runway. This one wants to keep on going and the wing wants to come up on the upwind side real easy. It stalls under 40mph which is the lowest number on the ASI. I have never flown a plane this "light" before but the modifications allow 200 more lbs of payload.

Its good experience. I just need some more practice since I haven't gotten to fly much lately. At least they know I am a safe pilot and just need a little more work.


David

Start flying by feel, paint by numbers doesn't lend well to stick and rudder stuff
 
I thought jump planes have only three speeds: Vy, Vne, and Vso.
 
80 on final in a 182 and Vso is 40?...yeah, good luck getting that thing down on the runway!

1.3x Vso final approach speed
 
Last edited:
Something is all wrong here, but ...

Try no flaps or just 10 degrees on a x-wind.

You want a clean, stabilized approach. I use the drop wing and maintain centerline method on short final. No crabbing in a bad x-wind. Use your rudder. That's what it's there for. Pretend it's a tail dragger.
 
Backup jump plane I fly also is 182A from 1956 with full STOL kit and wing extensions, it'll fly at 30 knots. You'll get used to it after flying it for a bit because it is totally different empty in a cross wind. Just keep your bank into the wind and you'll be ok, the gear on those planes are pretty hefty as it is.
 
Something is all wrong here, but ...

Try no flaps or just 10 degrees on a x-wind.

You want a clean, stabilized approach. I use the drop wing and maintain centerline method on short final. No crabbing in a bad x-wind. Use your rudder. That's what it's there for. Pretend it's a tail dragger.

If the crosswind is actually really bad you want as little energy as possible at touchdown should you depart the runway unexpectedly. Full flaps all the time, but sometimes I will suck them up right before I touch down so they don't shadow the rudder as much.
 
Slow the **** down, that plane will still fly at around 25kts, BTDT.
 
Fly the damn thing, don't let the chief pilot fly it for you. Take it up high, see where it stalls, learn to slow down to almost that, before even THINKING that it needs to be touching down.

If he wants 80 over the fence, fine... Dumb. But...

FLY it power off halfway down the runway because it's STILL FLYING and land it in 200' right at the middle of the damn thing if you must. It isn't going to land at 80, ever.

Sounds like what he wants is quick turns, those aren't a problem. Flying the thing the wrong speed and mashing the nose gear on? THAT will most certainly affect dispatch rate... As in, you'll break the damned airplane.

Mine, with calibration error on the ASI, lands when it indicates something like 30. You didn't say who's STOL kit or how effective it is.

Secondly... Ask for the POH addendum if it's a Robertson kit, and put the airspeed numbers in this idiot chief pilot's face. You're not supposed to be flying it without that addendum on board, anyway. If no addendum for the POH, ask why. If it's not a Robbie, I can't tell ya if it'll have such a thing, but I doubt the FAA lets too many STOL kits get approved without publishing new numbers.

Finally go pull the NORMAL POH and show him those numbers. Bet you won't find 80 in there anywhere.

Meanwhile, there's nothing specific about that airplane that will make it more susceptible to across winds other than not getting the damn yoke over hard and fast enough when necessary. If you're having a wing tipped up, you're WAY too late and not nearly aggressive enough. PUT the wing down and keep it there. You have a lot more aileron control than he big yoke and heavy controls make you think you do. How fast can you roll the yoke to either aileron stop? If a wing starts up, MOVE that yoke until you can't move it any more, if the gust lets up in the middle of moving it, move it back, quick. Yokes make you work harder, not less. With a stick, you'd just slap it over if you needed it.

Not using full flaps? What is he, an idiot? You use whatever flap you need.

There ya go... My thoughts. Fly the damned thing. Don't let it fly itself, and don't let the chief pilot fly it. Your job.

Something sounds very wrong with this story. Maybe he's testing you to see when you'll tell him to stuff it, and you'll start flying the airplane, thank-you-very-much? ;)
 
By the way. Go compare the stall speeds between the 172 and the 182. I bet you'll learn something interesting. And see a common mistake that many pilots transition up make, and many others assume. Just because it's bigger doesn't necessarily mean it lands faster...
 
If you have a good crosswind, (not sure about a 182, maybe 20?) get the thing on one wheel, add a bit of power and go the whole way down the runway on one wheel. Get so leaning that thing into the wind seems natural and right (as it is). THEN you are crosswind certified.
 
Nate is spot on. 80 is way too fast in a 182. I bet I would float halfway down the home field's 5500 foot runway if I came over the fence at that speed.

You want to kill your landings some more? Get your IR. Your landings will suffer terribly while in training. Mine did. :D
 
If the crosswind is actually really bad you want as little energy as possible at touchdown should you depart the runway unexpectedly. Full flaps all the time, but sometimes I will suck them up right before I touch down so they don't shadow the rudder as much.

I'll only dump flaps once touched down. Not prior. That was always taught to me as a bad thing. You never change configuration like that on final, at the last second. Doing that won't help much when doing commercial landing maneuvers either. Adding flaps in yes. Dumping lift when low to the ground is bad and hard to recover.

As full for flaps all the time, nope. if those electric flaps fail or the manual flaps fail like this old 182 has, you still have to land the plane. Ground speed will be higher but still landable.

David
 
Nate is spot on. 80 is way too fast in a 182. I bet I would float halfway down the home field's 5500 foot runway if I came over the fence at that speed.

You want to kill your landings some more? Get your IR. Your landings will suffer terribly while in training. Mine did. :D


Already been there and done that. Even had a sucky landing on the IR check ride which I thought would fail me, but it didn't.

David
 
If you have a good crosswind, (not sure about a 182, maybe 20?) get the thing on one wheel, add a bit of power and go the whole way down the runway on one wheel. Get so leaning that thing into the wind seems natural and right (as it is). THEN you are crosswind certified.

Good advice there. I did my Private in 1996 in Calif in the summer when there were never crosswinds. So this has always been an issue for me except when I was actively being a CFI. That was in 2008. :( Skills have gone down hill since.

David
 
Nate,

I was hoping you would chime in here. I knew you fly a STOL 182. I appreciate the great advice!

David
 
Thanks everyone else that I did not respond to that gave good, sound advice. I need to be more aggressive with the ailerons and slow the plane down more before landing. Those two things should make a good difference.

David
 
Care to elaborate?

Edit: I was landing in 25 knot xwinds all day yesterday without any apparent ill effects.

Let's see: The FAA recommends partial or no flaps.

Cessna recommends partial or no flaps.

Piper recommends partial or no flaps.

Now, who should I believe....you or the above?
 
Let's see: The FAA recommends partial or no flaps.

Cessna recommends partial or no flaps.

Piper recommends partial or no flaps.

Now, who should I believe....you or the above?

Do you ever slip with flaps?

I don't really care if you believe me or not, but I was hoping to get an answer better than "because they say not too."
 
Ditto. There are good aerodynamic reasons to reduce flaps in crosswinds. I am not going to look it up for you.

Like blanking out the rudder, which I mentioned. I also mentioned how I (and lots of other folks) dealt with it to maintain a slow touch down speed and full control authority.
 
As a data point, Cirrus recommends all landings be done at full flaps, the exceptions only being for training for flap failure or for extending a glide:

7801706398_9dcc53205b.jpg


Just one example, but worth noting for Cirrus pilots out there - land at less than full flaps and you're "outside the book", so to speak.
 
Nate,

I was hoping you would chime in here. I knew you fly a STOL 182. I appreciate the great advice!

David


I guess I'll say this... I've got 300 hours in the Robbie and I still wouldn't say I'm convinced I know just how slow it can safely fly. I've played with the low end of the envelope but even I'm chicken to pull it off the ground at the speeds it'll actually fly at. I've probably done their "emergency" Flaps 30 takeoff 20-25 times just to do it, and it's a non-natural feeling takeoff way behind the power curve.

I've gotten close, but just the time it takes to pull the yoke back on a Flap 30 takeoff, you'll be 5 knots over the book CAS number for rotation. If you pull before that you'll be on two wheels and probably drag the tail. It's a timing thing.

Landing, it'll land so bloody slow you can amaze yourself that there's enough air to fly at that speed.

The quickest way to learn how slow -- is to go up high and ease up to a power off stall from a glide.

Set up best glide and then take exactly 5 knots slower one mental notch at a time. Keep slowing. Arms getting tired yet? Trim. Keep slowing... Trim again. Keep slowing.

In mine, it let's me know when it's "done flying" by dropping the nose about 15-20 degrees and RESUMING flying. It doesn't have a tendency to drop a wing or try to head for a spin. I can (and have demoed this for others) lock my arms around the yoke and hold it all the way back and it'll just porpoise, going from about 500 FPM down to 1500 FPM down in a long phugoid oscillation all the way to Terra Firma if you were to let it.

Now release just enough back pressure to hold a descent without the oscillation. It's flying now. And there's how far you need the yoke back power-off and how much trim for a safe slow glide. That's also the speed to set up to land in what most would call a "full stall" landing. If you pull, it'll nose up once and then drop the nose.

Now look at the ASI. All that stuff about calibrated airspeed is no joke in a STOL airplane is it? ;) (it's going to read a lot slower than you think.)

During that whole test, make sure the radios are quiet and LISTEN to the airframe and air sounds. It's not a common powered flying habit, but a little time in a glider thermalling trains the brain to do it.

My particular aircraft makes a specific noise when the stall fences start working hard. They "sing" with a high pitched vibration is the best way I can describe it. I mentioned this once and David White confirmed his STOL 172 also did it. I can't speak for yours, other than to say "listen and see". In mine it's a big hint that you're WAY behind the power curve (at this altitude especially) and the drag is going to build up massively if you pull any more.

I mention it because it can give you a way not to fixate on the ASI so you can look outside to do the landing. ;)

The other thing to do in the practice area is good old power on slow flight. Find out roughly how much power you need to level off and hold it with full flap. (I've got 40. I don't know what you have.)

Start at approach speed and do the same slowing up drill, 5 knots at a time. You'll get to the stall horn. Keep going. Eventually it'll quit flying and give you lots of warning beforehand. Recover if she does anything squirrelly. If not, release just enough back pressure and maybe reduce power to set up a 500 FPM full flap power on glide. Note again the ASI (it'll look more normal but still seem low).

Now add whatever safety margin you like, and you have your general power setting and horizon picture for a power on approach the speed the airplane likes. It'll be WAY slower than 80.

(You can also do this partial flap for his weird insistence on that.)

Okay. Now you know exactly how it behaves. But you have a boss...

So... if boss wants 80, fine. You now know how far between 80 and the REAL landing/stall speeds of that particular airframe are now, and you can adjust mentally.

Mentally you're "flying 80" until the runway is made, then you'll work on FLYING down to the runway while slowing, power off, and TRIMMING the power change, and FLYING along at the slowing airspeed until the energy all bleeds away from drag. When you see the speed getting down there close to your numbers you saw at altitude, now you can start to "let it land".

If you're set up looking decent for landing on the numbers at 80, you won't really be close to letting it land until about the 1000' marker or that far down without markers if the runway doesn't have them. It's a "waste" of 1000' but it'll keep the chief pilot happy. Ha.

After a bit of practice you can come over the numbers, go to idle, fly smoothly down to a few feet off the ground, slowing up, and then add a bit of power to extend to about 200' before the turn-off you want, and close the throttle there, land and turn off. Heh. Especially with full flaps. It'll just "sit right down" when you close the throttle smoothly if you're a foot off the ground and at the right speed. Usually while the throttle is still sliding aft if you got it just right. Fun stuff.

Thong that up makes me want to go to the airport and go flying!!! ;)
 
Already been there and done that. Even had a sucky landing on the IR check ride which I thought would fail me, but it didn't.

David

Landings are not pat of the IR PTS, I did my final approach on the ride as a partial panel VOR in actual to about 100' above minimums before breaking out. The runway was where it should be and the DE said great, I've got it, nothing says you have to land." Then he proceeded to do a 'full currency landing' and I LOL'd. He said "What are you laughing at? I haven't signed your ticket yet." "Just laughing with you, I haven't had a good landing all week, makes me feel better seeing you bounce too."
 
Let's see: The FAA recommends partial or no flaps.

Cessna recommends partial or no flaps.

Piper recommends partial or no flaps.

Now, who should I believe....you or the above?

The only reason I can figure to reduce flaps is to increase the stall speed to reduce the crossing angle force vector.
 
I agree about the approach speed in hindsight Greg. The Chief Pilot wants me to fly the plane 80mph through the whole pattern. I usually step down the speeds on each leg. He recommends two notches flaps on downwind also and no more. When we did a no-flap landing the week before last it was even floatier and faster. May jsut have to go back to doing it the way I usually do. The cockpit flows are ok at least.

David

80 is wayyyy too fast for a 182-even with partial flaps.
 
Do you ever slip with flaps?

I don't really care if you believe me or not, but I was hoping to get an answer better than "because they say not too."

We're not getting into the "no slips with flaps" crap are we?

I've done hard slips in everything from a 140 to a 208b with full flaps and it's OK, I'd be disappointed if someone did a short field without a slip and flaps!

For x winds I have gone both ways with flaps on approach, only time I reduce flaps is for better penetration speed in gusts and turbulence, I still like to cross the threshold at vref


Also flew a 550 powered narrow body 182 and I would bring that in with some speed as it liked to touch down hard on the nose wheel if the speed fell off much (small tail + big engine and prop).
 
When I'm landing, I typically use ailerons for drift correction and rudder for centerline alignment.

The $516.32 question is: Slow flight and power off stalls teach us not to pick up a wing using ailerons, yet that is exactly what happens in a gusty crosswind. How do I reconcile these seemingly contradictory pieces of information?
 
When I'm landing, I typically use ailerons for drift correction and rudder for centerline alignment.

The $516.32 question is: Slow flight and power off stalls teach us not to pick up a wing using ailerons, yet that is exactly what happens in a gusty crosswind. How do I reconcile these seemingly contradictory pieces of information?

Unless the stall horn is screaming at you, still plenty of aileron left. Use it!
 
You're just too fast for an airplane with STOL that stalls under 40 MPH (with full flaps?).

1.3 times 40 = _______. Use that.

I am in training to be a jump plane pilot. I have flown this 1962ish 182A with STOL kit and nothing but foam on the floor and one seat/set of controls in it twice now. This thing floats like a balloon during landing even with the slightest crosswind. The Chief pilot wants me to fly with him one more time in a 172 cause it is somewhat light in comparison to a regular 182) so I can get some crosswind practice.

This 182 makes me realize how some of us are lazy or spoiled in other planes that just kind of quit flying when touching the runway. This one wants to keep on going and the wing wants to come up on the upwind side real easy. It stalls under 40mph which is the lowest number on the ASI. I have never flown a plane this "light" before but the modifications allow 200 more lbs of payload.

Its good experience. I just need some more practice since I haven't gotten to fly much lately. At least they know I am a safe pilot and just need a little more work.


David
 
Back
Top