Super high time engine

Tony_Scarpelli

Pattern Altitude
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
1,645
Location
Wichita, Kansas
Display Name

Display name:
Tony_Scarpelli
Hello guys,

9 years ago I bought a Cherokee with run out engine. 7000 TTAF, 20xx TBO. Fresh annual on my home field, compressions were 68, 69, 74, 76.

I wanted to learn to fly so I figured I would get my PPL and then worry about OH engine rather than chance screwing up a good engine....what did I know?

I flew every day for 1 1/2 months got my license. Inspected compressions again and they all went up: 74, 72, 76, 77. So I continued to fly the plane with occasional checks.

The two owners before me used Marvel Mystry oil 4 oz per 10 gallons in the fuel. So I continued the practice. Fast forward to the beginning of this year I had 3400 hrs on it, and it passed annual with flying colors. Over the 9 years I had rebuilt all the accessories figuring those are the things that get you broke down on an away field.

4 years ago I bought Turbo Comanche so I finally let go of my first air plane. It was very hard for me as I became more attached to it then some of my siblings. I sold it to a flight school and they rented it out for 300 hrs in a few months. Finally their IA was afraid to sign it off.

I told him to find another IA (or 2nd A&P to sign off the discrepancy engine) as I felt he was too conservative.

Compression were all still in the mid 70's and within 5 psi from the top to the bottom so a nice grouping. Boroscope showed normal usage. Valve guides/wabble test ok, Oil analysis, which I had performed every 100 hrs as long as I owned the airplane (with normal oil changes), showed gradual but normal wear meaning no reason to suspect any problems. NO metal in the filter nor screen. Never a hickup in running, no oil leaks, no over heated cyclinders. So why rebuild it?

Airlines did lots of studies on infant mortality or mechanic induced failures as well as TBO of parts/engines and found that a running engine with no signs of problems is more likely to continue running and not fail than a newly rebuilt engine will within the first 200 hrs.

I recommended flying it another year. Yesterday I went into the shop to say high and N6496R's 8500TTOE, 3400TBO hr O-320 was disassembled on the table, cleaned and measured parts. All parts were not only within serviceable limits but most are within new limits. No pitting, no corrosion, no spalding.

I am glad I don't have to buy the $8000 worth of parts to put it back together again. I couldn't help myself, busting the chops of the IA I have known for 9 years. His only response was "well, now we know."

My opinion is this: First Cherokee 150 hp engines are near bullet proof engines no doubt about it. Second high time flying regularly is a much better guarantee of condition than anything else. Third Marvel Mystery oil either works really well or at very least does no harm. Fourth, he may be a mechanic, A&P or IA but you as the owner know your engine. You should never substitute your knowledge for his when you know your plane. This is qualified with the following: I am no mechanic, I hate doing Oil changes on my own cars and have only done one on my Cherokee in 9 years. I did however take the time to read everything I could on Lycoming 0320 engines, talk to every mechanic I met in 9 years about same, take the Savvy Aviators maintenance cost reduction seminar on "Condition Based Maintenance." And am active in the decision making and supervision of excellent maintenance of my planes.

I know for a fact that many mechanics advice just like many lawyers advice seems more geared towards their financial means and needs than conditions at hand. I'm not bad mouthing Mechanics nor Lawyers it is just a human response to filter our advice through our own needs.

Prepare yourself to protect yourself.
 
No effin way.... TONY??? You're still alive?????

I guess you and Mark Twain have something in common!

Good to see you back on the boards, dude!!!
 
HI Mike,

I have a wonderful 5 year old Grand daughter who consumes about half my time. But now she is in school, I will get back to flying more. Sold the Cherokee but Kept the Comanche.

Glad to see so many of my old friends from red boards.
 
Hi Tony,

I put about 40 of those hours on 6496R. I was going to finish my ppl in her but she was so busy that I decided to transisition to my recently purchased 182. You obviously took care of that plane. Pat was considering a new interior, the last time I flew 6496R, the interior was near perfect other than being dated and much better than most of the trainers I have seen.

We did feel like the engine was not making as much power the last time I flew it compared to the first time. Full of fuel at max gross on a warm day, it was tough to get 300fmp on climb out. Imagine my surprise the first time I flew the 182 and was seeing almost 1500fpm.

I am kind of looking forward to doing a couple of laps in 6496R once it is put back together. :)

Jim
 
Hello guys,
I know for a fact that many mechanics advice just like many lawyers advice seems more geared towards their financial means and needs than conditions at hand. I'm not bad mouthing Mechanics nor Lawyers it is just a human response to filter our advice through our own needs.

Prepare yourself to protect yourself.

Let us assume for the sake of argument, that some poilot and or their fasmily got hurt in an accident with any engine that far over TBO.

How would the A&P-IA defend themselves in court?
 
Did the new owners keep running MMO?

As far as I know they were not. They were great and usually filled up as needed. I never saw them add anything. The few times I filled up, I never put anything in it.

Jim
 
Can any one explane how magic oil in fuel will effect the lower end of any engine? Specially when it is totally comsumed during combustion.
 
Can any one explane how magic oil in fuel will effect the lower end of any engine? Specially when it is totally comsumed during combustion.

It's not the lower end it is supposed to help, as I understand it.
 
Can any one explane how magic oil in fuel will effect the lower end of any engine? Specially when it is totally comsumed during combustion.

The guy I know who ran the TSIO-360-LB (I believe) in his Mooney 231 to 2,400 hours (an engine notorious for being on borrowed time after 1,000 hours) used it in his fuel and added to the oil religiously.

He swore MMO was the reason (although this was his second or third engine in that airplane that he'd wrung high time out of so obviously knew how to care for it...plus he flew multiple trips a week in it.)
 
Last edited:
Can any one explane how magic oil in fuel will effect the lower end of any engine? Specially when it is totally comsumed during combustion.

Doubt that I have the answers but there will be blow-by on the compression stroke. The other path is on cleaning the intake valves and contacting the oil on that side of the engine. I've know folks that use MMO. I've never used it. Dunno what the correct answer is with respect to its effectiveness.
 
Can any one explane how magic oil in fuel will effect the lower end of any engine? Specially when it is totally comsumed during combustion.

It's magic. . . . geesh. . . :rolleyes2:

of course, if some stoddard solvent was the solution to increasing engine life I would think that Conti and Lyc would have bought the guy out decades ago . . .
 
Doubt that I have the answers but there will be blow-by on the compression stroke. The other path is on cleaning the intake valves and contacting the oil on that side of the engine. I've know folks that use MMO. I've never used it. Dunno what the correct answer is with respect to its effectiveness.

None of that will get to the bottom end. Crankshaft, wrist pins, timing gears and such. Best MMO can do in gasoline is the valve train.

MMO in the oil, OTOH . . .
 
None of that will get to the bottom end. Crankshaft, wrist pins, timing gears and such. Best MMO can do in gasoline is the valve train.

MMO in the oil, OTOH . . .

Blow-by on the compression stroke won't get to the bottom end???
 
I seriously doubt there would be enough blow by to do any good. Unless the rings were worn out.

That gets me to the whatever comment stage. Of course the blow-by doesn't do any good because you say so....ummm, how far past TBO was that engine???
 
That gets me to the whatever comment stage. Of course the blow-by doesn't do any good because you say so....ummm, how far past TBO was that engine???

but all parts met the new or service limits ??
 
There's no blow-by in a new engine?

That is beside the point, tell me how an ash of any hydrocarbon will do any thing except turn the oil black?
 
Let us assume for the sake of argument, that some poilot and or their fasmily got hurt in an accident with any engine that far over TBO.

How would the A&P-IA defend themselves in court?

I believe there was a recent court case where a mechanic shop was found liable for an engine failure on a 337 that crashed. I think that engine wasn't even at TBO yet and they were found liable because they let the owner continue flying it?
 
Let us assume for the sake of argument, that some poilot and or their fasmily got hurt in an accident with any engine that far over TBO.

How would the A&P-IA defend themselves in court?

The same way that he would with any other engine. It passed the required inspections and was deemed airworthy.

As you know, if someone wants to come after you, you're pretty much screwed regardless.
 
The same way that he would with any other engine. It passed the required inspections and was deemed airworthy.

As you know, if someone wants to come after you, you're pretty much screwed regardless.

And then we wonder why mechanics want to replace this and that and charge like crazy to buy the liability insurance...
 
Hi Tony,

I put about 40 of those hours on 6496R. I was going to finish my ppl in her but she was so busy that I decided to transisition to my recently purchased 182. You obviously took care of that plane. Pat was considering a new interior, the last time I flew 6496R, the interior was near perfect other than being dated and much better than most of the trainers I have seen.

We did feel like the engine was not making as much power the last time I flew it compared to the first time. Full of fuel at max gross on a warm day, it was tough to get 300fmp on climb out. Imagine my surprise the first time I flew the 182 and was seeing almost 1500fpm.

I am kind of looking forward to doing a couple of laps in 6496R once it is put back together. :)

Jim

Hi Jim,

Thanks for reaching out to me. Send my your contact information PM and we can go fly the Comanche....

At full gross on a warm day you can read the markings on the bolts on the RV building across the runway as we climbed out in the Cherokee. That has always been that way. I know Pat put about 300 hrs on it after buying it from me.

Tony
 
Let us assume for the sake of argument, that some poilot and or their fasmily got hurt in an accident with any engine that far over TBO.

How would the A&P-IA defend themselves in court?

I understand the argument Tom. I'd try a defense with science, expert witnesses. I am not saying you wouldn't double your paperwork to document why that engine is still good.

Isn't the owners opinion of the engine one of the grading characteristics of the decision?

There has to be a happy medium.

By the way, I don't really fault a A&P who says I won't sign it off, the owner can shop A&P's and find someone to sign it off if they are knowledgeable about such practices. Its just that most pilots are not that knowledgeable. Hopefully we can help with that here.

Tom, thanks and keep up the good work. You more than most spend a good deal of your time training the rest of us. I didn't understand you at first but I have come to appreciate you. :)
 
I dont think that would be the APs issue.

Now on the other hand if it was a FBOs plane that was past TBO and being rented out without folks not knowing it was past it's recommended TBO, I could see that coming back and biting the FBO in the ass.




Personally I dont go over TBO.
 
It's magic. . . . geesh. . . :rolleyes2:

of course, if some stoddard solvent was the solution to increasing engine life I would think that Conti and Lyc would have bought the guy out decades ago . . .

I'm not sure last I checked at autozone there were 22 companies selling oil or gas additives. I think it is a case of branding. MMO has a brand just like Lucas oil or Murphy. It is so easy, cheap to start a small oil company that someone else would just pop up.

Its like the problem I have with too many computer repair places, I can't buy them all out and if I could some, knuckle head would start up some more. So best I can do is differentiate myself.

As to why big guys do not add it? I think it is the case that it is not good for everything, every where and if you add one element it takes away from another characteristic.

If all it does is help disolve tarnish build up on fuel systems, intake valves so they stick less, or by product and blow by helps keep the crank case clean then that is not a bad thing. I do not use it with my Turbo as I am unsure of its effects with super high heat and my turbo uses the same oil ad my engine.

If I did not have a turbo I'd consider using it on the Comanche.
 
but all parts met the new or service limits ??

Tom you seem to not believe this. I'd like to get to the bottom of this too. they are in the middle of the rebuild now so if you tell me exactly which readings and numbers you want, I will inquire and see if I cannot provide you with them.

I am not that interested in being proven wrong or right so much as gaining real information that can help us all. If I misunderstood something then lets find out and publish it for all to see. :)

All the parts are cleaned and on the table. I think he said he is sending the case to be checked, honed and painted in Tulsa; as well as the cam.

So lets get to the bottom of this.
 
It's not the lower end it is supposed to help, as I understand it.

Good point Greg, keeping top end good and top end metal out of the bearings would prevent premature O/H as well.

Doesn't have to 100% protect everything. I have had crop duster guys tell me they would never even check the bottom of an engine for the first 5000 hrs. If their oil analysis was ok. He said they put 2500 hrs on then top it, 2500 hrs and then maybe check the bottom.
 
Hey Tony! Howdy, long time. Hope the plane is running well.

As for making 3400 with the parts in tolerance, I can believe it. In the auto world that would be equivalent to about 150k miles @ under 50MPH average which is fairly common(use your multi-function driving meter to find average speed).

I have a Durango with 250k on it, and I'm betting my crank and rod journals will mic out pretty close to new, with minimal wear. That engine has over 5000 hours on it and going strong. Of course, different cooling systems, but a crank/rod journal is a crank/rod journal.
 
Hey Tony! Howdy, long time. Hope the plane is running well.

As for making 3400 with the parts in tolerance, I can believe it. In the auto world that would be equivalent to about 150k miles @ under 50MPH average which is fairly common(use your multi-function driving meter to find average speed).

I have a Durango with 250k on it, and I'm betting my crank and rod journals will mic out pretty close to new, with minimal wear. That engine has over 5000 hours on it and going strong. Of course, different cooling systems, but a crank/rod journal is a crank/rod journal.

Nice to see you here.

aopa ran me off for talking impolitely to a TSA guy, go figure.

Great to see you guys here.

btw-I run my dodge van's 250k, I have a Toyota now I am going to try for 400k.
 
Hey Tony! Howdy, long time. Hope the plane is running well.

As for making 3400 with the parts in tolerance, I can believe it. In the auto world that would be equivalent to about 150k miles @ under 50MPH average which is fairly common(use your multi-function driving meter to find average speed).

I have a Durango with 250k on it, and I'm betting my crank and rod journals will mic out pretty close to new, with minimal wear. That engine has over 5000 hours on it and going strong. Of course, different cooling systems, but a crank/rod journal is a crank/rod journal.

I'm into an '85 Pontiac 5.0 right now. 350k miles, documented miles. No ridge, rod bearings look good, no oil consumption.
If it had not been showing sign of head gasket trouble, I'd not be into it, but still driving it. No MMO used, but also no lead in th' gas either.
 
If it had not been showing sign of head gasket trouble, I'd not be into it, but still driving it. No MMO used, but also no lead in th' gas either.

The unleaded fuel I think to be the biggest issue.

Keep the heat down, the lead out, and run 'em frequently.
 
Personally I think the fact that Tony flew the wings off that thing has a lot more to do with the engine wear than any additive. IIRC, Tony flies more than anyone on this board. VFR too, if memory serves. Welcome dude.
 
Tony!

How are you sir! How is the Comanche doing?

Good to see you back on the boards...

Great post too!!!

All the best to you.
 
Thank you both.

I love and fly the Comanche. Although I have not flown enough this year. I let my brother, IA and Friend fly the Comanche to help keep the thing in shape.

Last year our annual was about $400...

Yes I fly by hand, VFR to both coasts regularly.... The plane is IFR but not the pilot.
 
I've seen many Lycomings go double and triple beyond TBO with no issues, compressions in the 70's and no metal in the filter. Not quite the same story with the small continentals.
 
Thank you both.

I love and fly the Comanche. Although I have not flown enough this year. I let my brother, IA and Friend fly the Comanche to help keep the thing in shape.

Last year our annual was about $400...

Yes I fly by hand, VFR to both coasts regularly.... The plane is IFR but not the pilot.

Tony, when I found my hangar and opened the door there sat a 172 and a Comanche. They both have been setting for about 25 years.

Today the 172 is flying again, the comanche just sets. I believe the owner received a DUI years ago and lost his PPL.

Back to the thread.

You have blow by on a new engine, its just not alot. Well at first untill the rings seat you have more blow by but even after the rings seat those rings do not keep 100% of the combustion in the cylinders, no way they can. If they could we would not need a PCV system.
Your PCV, Postive Crankcase ventilation system keeps your rings seated and the gas fumes out of the block. On older cars we called them draft tubes. Next time you see a tractor pull event watch under those engines. That steam you see coming from thos two tubes is the old Draft system. they do not use a PCV Valve on those engines like we do not use them on airplane engines. We use a catch can like the draft systems. They started using catch cans to keep the oil off the road.
A PCV system does a better job a sealing the rings from the draft system. They both do a good job of scavaging the fumes from the block so you do not have a bomb that will go bang or blow up.

Tony

Lead in fuel does nothing but lubricate the valves. Period. No More, its there for the valve train.
 
Lead in fuel does nothing but lubricate the valves. Period. No More, its there for the valve train.

That has been proven wrong many times over by those who run auto unleaded fuel.
 
Back
Top