Would you fly on this?

TangoWhiskey

Touchdown! Greaser!
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
14,210
Location
Midlothian, TX
Display Name

Display name:
3Green
(see picture below)

It would be hard to miss... "traffic at 8000, opposite direction..."

A better question than "would you fly on this" is "do you think they'll ever really build and fly it?"

======================================

Even though the Aeroscraft dwarfs the largest commercial airliners, it requires less net space on the ground than any plane because it doesn't need a runway. The airship takes off and lands like a helicopter: straight up and down.

This is not a Blimp. It's a sort of flying Queen Mary 2 that could change the way you think about air travel. It's the Aeroscraft, and when it's completed, it will ferry pampered passengers across continents and oceans as they stroll leisurely about the one-acre cabin or relax in the ir well-appointed staterooms.

Unlike its dirigible ancestors, the Aeroscraft is not lighter than air. Its 14 million cubic feet of helium hoist only two-thirds of the craft's weight. The rigid and surprisingly aerodynamic body-driven by huge rearward propellers generates enough additional lift to keep the behemoth and its 400-ton payload aloft while cruising. During takeoff and landing, six turbofan jet engines push the ship up or ease its descent.

This two-football-fields-long concept airship is the brainchild of Igor Pasternak, whose privately funded California firm, Worldwide Aeros Corporation, is in the early stages of developing a prototype and expects to have one completed by 2010. Pasternak says several cruise ship companies have expressed interest in the project, and for good reason: The craft would have a range of several thousand miles and, with an estimated top speed of 174 mph, could traverse the continental US in about 18 hours. During the flight, passengers would peer at national landmarks just 8,000 feet below or, if they weren't captivated by the view, the cavernous interior would easily accommoda te such amenities as luxury staterooms, restaurants, even a casino.

To minimize noise, the aft-mounted propellers will be electric, powered by a renewable source such as hydrogen fuel cells. A sophisticated buoyancy-management system will serve the same purpose as trim on an airplane, allowing for precise adjustments in flight dynamics to compensate for outside conditions and passenger movement. The automated system will draw outside air into compartments throughout the ship and compress it to manage onboard weight.

On a pressurized plane, windows like these would explode outward. The Aeroscraft does not fly high enough to need pressurization.

The company envisions a cargo-carrying version that could deliver a store's worth of merchandise from a centralized distribution center straight to a Walmart parking lot or, because the helium-filled craft will float, a year's worth of supplies to an offshore oil rig. "You can land on the snow, you can land on the water," Pasternak says. "It's a new vision of what can be done in the air."

Aeroscraft
Purpose: Long-range travel for passengers who are more concerned with the journey than the destination.
Dimensions (feet): 165 h x 244 w x 647 l
Max Speed: 174 mph
Range: 6,000 miles
Capacity: 250 passengers
 

Attachments

  • ATT1.jpg
    ATT1.jpg
    34.2 KB · Views: 53
Troy Whistman said:
(It would be hard to miss... "traffic at 8000, opposite direction..."

During the flight, passengers would peer at national landmarks just 8,000 feet below

Uh, storms?
 
sure is ugly --- but think of the space for advertising potential?
 
CapeCodJay said:
sure is ugly --- but think of the space for advertising potential?


They say it is not a lighter-than-air craft... so what category/class would you need to fly the thing? A type-rating, for sure.
 
The Flying Whale.
If it's worth it flying around weather delays or cancelling for companies, it could be a huge freighter to remote, undeveloped sites.
 
Sure, why not.
It has character, weird character but at least it has character. It beats riding in a pressurized death trap cattle car that's for sure.

Problem is that it's P121. I only do P91 and maybe under certain conditions P135.
 
I would!

I mean they are not talking a flying bus here (ake modern jets); this is supposed to be a "cruiseliner in the sky".

Think about cruising South America, or the African plains, in this thing? Also, given its potential STOL capability, you could have a much smaller area, more remote, for landings and off-ship excursions.
 
tdager said:
I would!

I mean they are not talking a flying bus here (ake modern jets); this is supposed to be a "cruiseliner in the sky".

Think about cruising South America, or the African plains, in this thing? Also, given its potential STOL capability, you could have a much smaller area, more remote, for landings and off-ship excursions.

You're right... maybe not for point to point travel, but cruises would be awesome, both island and inland. French wine country? Italy, anyone? Historic Greece?
 
Back
Top