woodstock
Final Approach
is anyone here following this? any tips on the best and worst teams? thanks...
woodstock said:is anyone here following this? any tips on the best and worst teams? thanks...
They were great in the Euro2004 tournement. I was really rooting for them, but alasSJP said:Sweden. Way overdue...and a deceptively strong team in recent european championships..
Real Madrid for his regular team in the Champions league but is still also playing for England. Wayne Roney os also on England and is an icredible player for 'The Mighty Reds' during Premier league season.woodstock said:Isn't Becks still with Madrid?
smigaldi said:They were great in the Euro2004 tournement. I was really rooting for them, but alas
But what about England?? They are due too 1964 lead by Boby Moore was a great team but come on 42 years later and not even a close call. It would be nice to see it again. But no way for Mexico. C'mon Elizabeth out arch rival from CONCACAF?? NO WAY US OVER MEXICO. We beat them this year.
SkyHog said:As an American, I can say that World Cup does not interest me.
As a man, I can say that its a sport, so I'll at least watch some of it
SkyHog said:Scott - I never understood how soccer is exciting. The game is what, 45 minutes long? In that 45 minutes, sometimes you'll have a score of 1-0. The excitement pours on maybe 3 times during the game when someone gets a wide open shot and then missed the goal by about 10 feet.
That's something I don't get, also. These guys are professional athletes, yet in any other sport, if you missed as many passes, shots and steals, you'd be cut immediately. These guys can run, but come on, how do you miss a goal that is like 20 feet wide with ONE guy blocking it? That doesn't even happen in Hockey, on skates and ice with a tiny goal and a giant goaltender.
But I sure wish I could run like that
I entered a World Cup pool at work. I know nothing. Go Czech Republic!
woodstock said:a good game has a very low score - it means both teams are superb.
woodstock said:a good game has a very low score - it means both teams are superb.
N2212R said:There are few sports which I prefer to watch women over men. Tennis being one - volleys seem to be more exciting, and soccer is the other. From the few matches I've watched with men it seems to go like this:
Frantic pace until one team scores.
The team that now has the lead just kicks the ball deep into the other end.
Repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
Now with women's soccer, I don't know what it is but, it seems that once a goal is score it's like drawing blood and the feeding frenzy begins and they want to show those women who's boss.
"Oh look at her with the same haircut as me! Nuh-uh girlfriend, that *$&# ain't got nothing on me. Runnin' around in those shorts and shin gaurds like she's all that, she better step back. Gimme that ball, I'll show her who's all that! I don't care if we're up by two, I'm showing her!"
"You go girl!"
And you get games that are 5-3. That's fun to watch.
Men's games:
"Ok we're up, we only need 1 to win, so lets just protect the lead ok?"
"Ok, sounds good."
SkyHog said:Scott - I never understood how soccer is exciting. The game is what, 45 minutes long? In that 45 minutes, sometimes you'll have a score of 1-0. The excitement pours on maybe 3 times during the game when someone gets a wide open shot and then missed the goal by about 10 feet.
That's something I don't get, also. These guys are professional athletes, yet in any other sport, if you missed as many passes, shots and steals, you'd be cut immediately. These guys can run, but come on, how do you miss a goal that is like 20 feet wide with ONE guy blocking it? That doesn't even happen in Hockey, on skates and ice with a tiny goal and a giant goaltender.
But I sure wish I could run like that
I entered a World Cup pool at work. I know nothing. Go Czech Republic!
That is the way I feel about baseball. If you understand the game, there is a lot of strategy there. But if you don't -- or if you're watching it on TV -- it is dull as dirt.smigaldi said:Soccer is really exciting in that it does not have time outs or tons of commercials. Probably why it will never be huge in the US. But once you understand the game it is very exciting.
Ken Ibold said:I used to play soccer up into high school, at which point we moved and the new school didn't have a soccer team. (I was a fairly good goalie in my day.) But watching soccer on TV just doesn't cut it. Football, on the other hand, is better on TV than in the stands.
Darrell111 said:I can honestly say soccer players are the fastest and most agile of any other athletes of any other sport. Lets debate that
woodstock said:clearly no one has read my joke - I think it covers a lot of what you are talking about.
woodstock said:clearly no one has read my joke - I think it covers a lot of what you are talking about.
SJP said:Actually, I think the nature of most American sports is exactly why the USA has had so much trouble breaking into the World Soccer Scene.
Most American sports are very explosive - large outputs of energy over a relatively short period of time. Football is very obvious, but Hockey...skaters rarely spend more than a couple minutes at a time on the ice. Basketball sees the team constantly rotating. Baseball is a hit, brief sprint, and back to the dugout.
Soccer is much more sustained - while not everyone is in constant motion, there is a much less opportunity to rest or take a break for the duration of the game.
Now when the US wakes up to the Global money making opportunity that is Soccer...well, it's going to be interesting Finally, the World Championship will be played against people other than...well...the US
I wouldn't say Superior....different focus maybe.Darrell111 said:The thing is since most Americans dont watch soccer or know much about it they dont realize the superior athleticism that it takes to play it. These guys are BLAZING fast and can cut on a dime all while trying to keep a ball in front of them
LOL - well, thats FIFA. With all respect, good results this year do not make you better than Germany, Italy, Argentina, France or Sweden...The rankings are a constant source of amusement The USA was seeded 9th for the tournament, which is probably more accurate - England was seeded 2...never gonna happen !! The US have a good team, but I just don't think they are going to overcome Italy and the Czechs.Oh and just so some of yall know ..
The USA soccer team is quite respected (ranked 5th in the world by FIFA).
The USA have a tough starting group. Qualifying out of that group will need a win against Ghana, and then at least one more win against Italy or the Czechs. Winning the group would get them a relatively easy second round, second place would probably see them playing Brazil...and one has to think that would be the end of the tournament.They have a chance to really earn some respect this World cup. If they could tie or even beat Brazil (highly unlikely) that would really say alot. I think they will walk all over Italy too.
SJP said:I wouldn't say Superior....different focus maybe.
LOL - well, thats FIFA. With all respect, good results this year do not make you better than Germany, Italy, Argentina, France or Sweden...The rankings are a constant source of amusement The USA was seeded 9th for the tournament, which is probably more accurate - England was seeded 2...never gonna happen !! The US have a good team, but I just don't think they are going to overcome Italy and the Czechs.
The USA have a tough starting group. Qualifying out of that group will need a win against Ghana, and then at least one more win against Italy or the Czechs. Winning the group would get them a relatively easy second round, second place would probably see them playing Brazil...and one has to think that would be the end of the tournament.
England have a relatively easy group - only Sweden is expected to give us much problems. We'd expect to come top in the group, and then see probably Poland in the last 16. We'll probably screw it up tho...
N2212R said:There are few sports which I prefer to watch women over men.
flyersfan31 said:Two World Wars and one World Cup, doo dah, doo dah....
Gotta love the English cheers!
.
SJP said:Someone sent me this :
Sorry, I had to put it into a .ZIP file because Power Point Slideshow isn't allowed
SJP said:Someone sent me this :
Sorry, I had to put it into a .ZIP file because Power Point Slideshow isn't allowed