If it is not a public benefit, it is private. If I want to use my private property (airplane) to further my business or the business of my employer, why should I be denied the right to do so? I'm not holding out to the public nor am I employed as a professional pilot. I'm not making a profit on the operation, only reimbursement of the expenses defined by the regulations, which is allowed now but only if I do not carry passengers or property. It's an entirely private operation, using my private property, for private benefit. The current case law surrounding 61.113 impinges arbitrarily on my private property rights.