Piper Tomahawk 125HP upgrade. Any difference in performance?

Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by easik, Jul 14, 2018.

  1. easik

    easik Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2017
    Messages:
    233

    Display name:
    easik
    Just curious, those of you who own or have flown the 125 HP engine Tomahawk. Did you see any increase in performance? more specifically the climb rate. I don't except any changes in cruise speed but for the climb out on hot/humid days, did the extra horse power make a difference? thanks.
     
  2. kyleb

    kyleb Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    7,065
    Location:
    Marietta, GA

    Display name:
    Drake the Outlaw
    There aren't many around, and I haven't flown one, but on a 1670 lb gross weight airplane, the additional 13 hp should give you ~205 fpm assuming an 80% efficient prop. That's a pretty big improvement. The calculation is 33,000 lbft/min/hp x 13 hp x 80%/1670 lbs.
     
    Aldeskeukin likes this.
  3. Steven Untet

    Steven Untet Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2016
    Messages:
    125

    Display name:
    88Echo
    Could you please extrapolate your equation?
    Thank you


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. slacktide

    slacktide Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    556

    Display name:
    Dan
    FYI if you want one, you will have to buy an plane with it installed already, at least for the forseeable future. The STC owner, Ken Blackman, passed away on May 27. His son Grant is trying to figure out how to get his STC’s transferred to his name. Don’t know if he intends to continue offering the STC or sell it off, but in the meantime he’s fired the business’s only remaining employee, who used to do all the fab work for the baffles and oil cooler. I understand he’s had the business’s phone line disconnected as well.
     
  5. GC Potts

    GC Potts Filing Flight Plan

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2018
    Messages:
    1

    Display name:
    Gary
    I occasionally fly a 125hp Tomahawk here in New Zealand. I have over 500 hours on the standard 112hp T2 model. Most noticeable is the increased rate of climb, attaining typically another 200fpm (i.e 500fpm total) at mauw from my local field (110ft amsl). Also IAS @2400rpm cruise is up from 95kn to 100kn. Fuel 25 litres/hr (6.6USG/hr). On the downside, exaggerated yaw on reducing power can induce significant roll that isn't so noticeable with the 112hp model. Overall I much prefer the extra hp of this conversion.
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2022
  6. frfly172

    frfly172 Touchdown! Greaser! PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    15,547
    Location:
    mass fla

    Display name:
    ron keating
    You could have trouble finding one. The people that have them like them and seem to keep them.
     
  7. saddletramp

    saddletramp Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Messages:
    696
    Location:
    Walla Walla. WA

    Display name:
    saddletramp
    I'm currently giving instruction in one that a student pilot purchased. It performs much better than say a Cessna 150. It's been over 30 years since I instructed in an original one so a bit hard for me to compare. We took off today at gross weight & it took no time to climb to 4,500'. We were operating out of a field with a density altitude of 3,000 (field elevation is 644"). I quite like it.

    Our ground speed according to the GPS was around 103 Knts. No wind.