Anthony
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 18,478
- Display Name
Display name:
Anthony
I just read the blurb about AOPA's response to the "USA Today" editorial about reopening Washington National airport to GA. Here's a clip from the AOPA website article:
The editorial suggested that opening the airport to GA traffic puts the D.C. area at substantially higher risk of attack from terrorists. Still harping on the May 11 Cessna 150 incident and using highly inflammatory language, the editorial suggested that they might feel more sympathetic, "if the lackadaisical security for private planes had been ratcheted way up after 9/11.
"Instead, the government has ducked security for the nation's 220,000 private planes and their well-connected owners. Nearly four years after terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, pilots' licenses contain no photographs, making it relatively easy for a terrorist to use someone else's license."
"USA Today has a long history of anti-GA sentiment," said AOPA's Executive Vice President of Communications, Jeff Myers. "It is inexplicable that 'The Nation's Newspaper' — as they call themselves — would portray general aviation, a critical part of the nation's transportation infrastructure, so inaccurately. It's one thing to have a bad opinion. It's another thing to report bad facts."
Now what jumps out at me is the "private planes and their well-connected owners" statement. Why do mainstream media outlets and pressure groups like "Stop the Noise" continuously use this tactic and try to paint us all as spoiled, rich people who can work th system to our benefit? Is it just envy that we can do something they can't or an attempt to create more interest in the story from the general populace?
The editorial suggested that opening the airport to GA traffic puts the D.C. area at substantially higher risk of attack from terrorists. Still harping on the May 11 Cessna 150 incident and using highly inflammatory language, the editorial suggested that they might feel more sympathetic, "if the lackadaisical security for private planes had been ratcheted way up after 9/11.
"Instead, the government has ducked security for the nation's 220,000 private planes and their well-connected owners. Nearly four years after terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, pilots' licenses contain no photographs, making it relatively easy for a terrorist to use someone else's license."
"USA Today has a long history of anti-GA sentiment," said AOPA's Executive Vice President of Communications, Jeff Myers. "It is inexplicable that 'The Nation's Newspaper' — as they call themselves — would portray general aviation, a critical part of the nation's transportation infrastructure, so inaccurately. It's one thing to have a bad opinion. It's another thing to report bad facts."
Now what jumps out at me is the "private planes and their well-connected owners" statement. Why do mainstream media outlets and pressure groups like "Stop the Noise" continuously use this tactic and try to paint us all as spoiled, rich people who can work th system to our benefit? Is it just envy that we can do something they can't or an attempt to create more interest in the story from the general populace?