Cessna 182 vs Super 170

Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by motoadve, Jun 27, 2021.

  1. motoadve

    motoadve Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    307

    Display name:
    motoadve
  2. Deelee

    Deelee Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Messages:
    1,494

    Display name:
    Deelee
    Which one won?
     
  3. motoadve

    motoadve Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    307

    Display name:
    motoadve
    Depends on the mission.
    182 is more versatile, Super 170 more for off airport and more fun to fly.
    182 can do more (IFR, travel faster, more room).
     
  4. steingar

    steingar Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,464
    Location:
    Land of Savages

    Display name:
    steingar
    Seems like a poor comparison to me. Comparing a 182 to a 180 would seem more appropriate to my old bald fat self.
     
  5. Narwhal

    Narwhal Pre-Flight

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2019
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Anchorage

    Display name:
    Narwhal
    I've never flown a 170 although I've ogled and fondled quite a few. If I'm flying for recreation/fun/adventure I'd probably rather have the 170 especially if it's a super 170 with an O-360. If I'm flying for somewhat practical transportation between airports the 182 usually carries more weight, farther, faster. I actually wanted a 170 when I was shopping for airplanes but 180 HP 170's were considerably more expensive than 182's that were 10-20 years newer ($80k 170s vs $60k 182s). Personally I find 182's kind of boring and wish I had a 170, but alas I own a C182B. Part of the problem is that C170B are few in number and getting ancient. Purchasing the O-360 STC for them is also getting to be cost prohibitive, so you have to find one that's already had it done if you want the 180 HP motor.
     
  6. Southpaw

    Southpaw Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2019
    Messages:
    357
    Location:
    Montana

    Display name:
    Ernest Taft
    I looked at a 170B before buying my 172. It was a late 1956 model with 1950 hours TT . All original . Interior was a bit ratty but had been hangered all its life. Two old farmer buddies in their late 80's and early 90's. Both lost medicals , plane hadn't been flown in 5 years but was just annualed when I looked at it. They had owned it since nearly new.
     
  7. Narwhal

    Narwhal Pre-Flight

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2019
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Anchorage

    Display name:
    Narwhal
    Yep, I looked at a few kind of like that except probably not as nice as the one you describe considering the low corrosion potential in Montana. Usually the barn finds that haven't flown for 5+ years are going to be megabuck maintenance problems unfortunately.
     
  8. motoadve

    motoadve Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    307

    Display name:
    motoadve
    Unfortunately all the C180 pilots I know wont take their planes off airport., so no 180 to compare to.
     
  9. EdFred

    EdFred Taxi to Parking

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    27,581
    Location:
    Michigan

    Display name:
    Ed Frederick
    What's the point of a tail-dragger if you aren't going off-roading/off-airporting?
     
    Huckster79 likes this.
  10. Lowflynjack

    Lowflynjack En-Route

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    3,064

    Display name:
    Jack Fleetwood
    Still sexy as hell!

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Mtns2Skies likes this.
  11. idahoflier

    idahoflier Cleared for Takeoff

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2017
    Messages:
    1,209

    Display name:
    idahoflier
    You should have titled this "Super 182 vs Super 170" as your C182 is hardly stock... ;-)