Search results

  1. M

    182 Crash in Los Angeles

    This hurts to see the picture above. It's me in the left seat flying out of Wikenburg, AZ in 2008 with a brand new paint job on 3BW. I was a partner in that plane for many years and flew her throughout California and Mexico. I loved her strength, speed and how she always got us home safely...
  2. M

    DME Required... really?

    Tim and Ron, Thank you for weighing in. I have respect for your work on this board and know that you both give thought to your posts. What I haven't read on this message board is any discussion of Garmins' AFMS limitation. What is meant by Garmin's limitation: that the G1000 is not...
  3. M

    DME Required... really?

    You may be correct that Garmin means that the G1000 cannot be substituted for the localizer and that would have been simple to write. But Garmin didn’t write that. Instead the limitation is clear: Accomplishment of a non-GPS ILS is not authorized. To me, that’s plain: you can’t use the...
  4. M

    DME Required... really?

    Thank you for the quick responses. I can accept that "lateral" as used in 1-2-3, may not include along track distances but I'm having a real problem with the AFMS limitation. Look at AIM 1-1-9 that tells us that an Instrument Landing System (emphasis on "system") consists of three parts: 1)...
  5. M

    DME Required... really?

    This is an answer that I want to be on the wrong side of. A pilot at KMYF asked if the KMYF ILS LOC 28R approach which is noted as “DME Required” applied to his G1000 equipped airplane. My first thought was although the plane has no DME, it does have a panel mounted, database current...
Back
Top