RotorAndWing
Final Approach
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,496
- Location
- Other side of the world
- Display Name
Display name:
Rotor&Wing
I don't think it is anymore. It probably hurts the development of high speed rail between some cities and leads to over crowded hub airports. if the market cannot support the cost of a ticket from some of these places then air service should die, it should not be supported by the rest of us.
Seems to me there's a good market for operating a bunch of Navajos and 402s over those routes instead of 1900s and Dash 8s. At the very least it would decrease the costs significantly.
Crystal BernardAnd that Chick with the Hair...
Will you be saying the same thing about rail service?
I'll have to say this was basically a good idea but I would make it 90 minutes instead of miles to account for some of the driving conditions in different parts of the country (it takes a lot longer to drive 90 miles in New England than it does in Montana). Another question, did places like Visalia, CA have airline service before deregulation?article said:President Bush tried to trim $50 million from the program by eliminating subsidies to cities within 90 miles of an airport, but Congress refused under pressure from affected communities
We recently got Cape Air into LNS under this grant. We do not have interstate or major highway accesss directly to either PHL or BWI, the two closest Bravos. We DO have highway access to MDT, but that's another small airport that has to take you to a hub somewhere and dump you off.
The access to BWI is convenient, a money saver for the business travellers (like my wife) who are using it. It brings in bidders to the Auto Auction in Manheim. While it is not yet self supporting, that IS the goal and the airport is making noise about hoping to get there. Ticket sales are steadily increasing.
Whether it's truly "essential" to Lancaster is an open question. We certainly weren't failing to grow as an area without it. But we definitely don't have handy access to a hub airport via highway. And rail service to Philadelphia is both costly and inconvenient.
Jim G
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/business/2012-07-16/feds-consider-keeping-macon-atlanta-flight-subsidy-despite-averageFederal officials are considering restoring a subsidy of more than $1 million to keep Atlanta-to-Macon passenger flights, despite the route’s 2011 average of about one person aboard each flight.
Seems to me there's a good market for operating a bunch of Navajos and 402s over those routes instead of 1900s and Dash 8s. At the very least it would decrease the costs significantly.
Are GA airports really essential?