I had read somewhere that LPA was scrapped as being overly complex.
Just like last time. If no corroborating no FAA announcement (just like last time) it will burn hot then fade out without further mention (just like last time).Betting that announcement - if made - will have lots of words but offer no detail, no substance, and no news. I hope they prove me wrong, but I doubt they will.
Betting that announcement - if made - will have lots of words but offer no detail, no substance, and no news. I hope they prove me wrong, but I doubt they will.
Since when did the FAA ever care about deadlines, even those "mandated" by Congress. They ignored them whenever they want.Well, if there's any truth to the 12/31/2023 deadline and the 16 month NPRM there should be something coming out...
Since when did the FAA ever care about deadlines, even those "mandated" by Congress. They ignored them whenever they want.
Except that it was congress that put in the "gotta have an FAA medical to fly without an FAA medical" clause.I can't help but think that a simple congressional amendment law - [...]- would change everything and make the need for this go away. "Basic Med shall not require a prior FAA medical".
Yes - that’s the point. It would take congress to do that. I don’t think they would violently object today with all the data we have - assuming they were interested enough to look.
Have some clever congress person tack it to the end of an obscure bill right before a recess. No one would notice or care enough to block it.
But who is going to pay for it?Have some clever congress person tack it to the end of an obscure bill right before a recess.
But, I don't follow the FAA and congressional mandates that closely so if you have evidence of the FAA ignoring congressional mandates I'll concede the point...
https://www.horten-aircraft.com/en/I want that Horton.
I REALLY want that Horton.
You mean how much a congress person has to be paid to make a bill?But who is going to pay for it?
What makes you think the FAA wanted to delay or stop it? I heard that they had something similar ready, but that the Department of Transportation stonewalled it, thus providing the motivation for Congressional involvement.I seem to recall BasicMed rolled out on time and I know the FAA would have done ANYTHING to delay or stop that if they could...
What makes you think the FAA wanted to delay or stop it? I heard that they had something similar ready, but that the Department of Transportation stonewalled it, thus providing the motivation for Congressional involvement.
And they won't be interested unless something's in it for them. Pilots simply aren't a large enough voting block to matter,Yes - that’s the point. It would take congress to do that. I don’t think they would violently object today with all the data we have - assuming they were interested enough to look.