You asked for reports of people who never developed symptoms, and I supplied one. If you don't like the source, that's your lookout. There are many others, I just grabbed the first one I found. Again, broaden your information sources.
I only know the location of one of the sites, so at this point, there's nothing to compare.
FYI: Since recovered/asymptomatic cases are not being equally counted there are a number of models developed and being developed to calculate that data. Past preliminary modeling that is available publicly put recovered cases at the 97.5% to 99% of the confirmed covid cases as that data is generally collected. However, the asymptomatic side is a bit more varied from 18% to 30% with some as high as 70% of the population are asymptomatic. While there a quite a few studies/reports in the public domain most of the data is from the Jan-Apr months. Unfortunately the newer studies/models are still behind various private search engines or other pay walls.
You have a problem with groupthink?
Social media is not the problem and your photo is evidence of that. There was no social media in 1912 and yet people ignoring mask requirements was enough of an issue that some places had to threaten people with jail time for non-compliance. Social media isn't the problem, people are.
Why not both?
Am i the only one that has serious doubts about the authenticity of said photo?The world has been here before. This is not new. And, we're a lot more technologically advanced than back then. The only disadvantage today is that social media exists and everyone is an "expert".
Even with good, controlled, data, it's sometimes hard to 'prove' things. Much of the data on Covid is the result of many uncontrolled experiments. Hospitals don't report cases the same way, neither do cities, counties, states, or countries. In my opinion, it's definitely not 'nothing', even though I know very few who have been affected and I live in a city. Something is going on, but it may be better or worse than what we have been told, not to mention that we have been told a whole spectrum of things by different people and agencies. The thought that, in the end, all this data can be adjusted in order to come to some concrete conclusion doesn't seem possible. Also how one person reacts to the virus or any treatment will be different than how someone else reacts. It may end up to be statistically predictable, but predictions are not the same as results. That's like saying a percentage of GA flights result in accidents. It doesn't determine whether or not a certain individual will. I think people want more certainty, one way or another, than is possible.Rapidly headed toward this. Both via data manipulation and often just good old fashioned human error in all of it.
Why anybody would have expected the entire thing to be riddled with mass human error on a worldwide scale as large as the pandemic itself, considering we all KNOW how that works in everything else in life... boggles me.
It’s becoming easy to take ANY data set other than the Doc notes per patient individually and find omission, methodology, math, or other common errors in all of them now. And we ALL know even the Docs make errors in the source material.
Well at least I assume we all do. Nobody’s read their medical record and said, “That’s not even the symptom I talked to him/her about! I wonder if their transcription service clicked on the wrong patient.” LOL.
Nobody’s going to have this story “right” even a decade from now.
The CDC has done some analysis on additional mortality. It suggests that the total impact on the death count is significantly higher than the Covid-19 counts that any of the counts that are currently being shown in the news.Rapidly headed toward this. Both via data manipulation and often just good old fashioned human error in all of it.
Why anybody would have expected the entire thing to be riddled with mass human error on a worldwide scale as large as the pandemic itself, considering we all KNOW how that works in everything else in life... boggles me.
It’s becoming easy to take ANY data set other than the Doc notes per patient individually and find omission, methodology, math, or other common errors in all of them now. And we ALL know even the Docs make errors in the source material.
Well at least I assume we all do. Nobody’s read their medical record and said, “That’s not even the symptom I talked to him/her about! I wonder if their transcription service clicked on the wrong patient.” LOL.
Nobody’s going to have this story “right” even a decade from now.
Because the math doesn't add up. Remove social media and leave only people, the problem still exists. Remove people and leave only social media, the problem disappears.
I haven't been able to find an example of the photo without the sign. The original photo is allegedly in a collection at the Mill Valley Public Library. I suppose that if someone was sufficiently interested, they could contact the library and ask someone to look at it.
I’m no period expert, but the whole photo seems odd to me. Their clothing seems Ill fitting and more like props than real clothes.
Do they look any more ill-fitting than other photos in the collection?
I hope you're being deliberately facetious or obtuse. Social media is driven by people. Social media amplifies the worst aspects of humanity. Based upon your logic, I gather you agree that gun control of any kind is not the answer to preventing gun violence. After all, remove guns and people will still find ways to be violent. Remove people...the problem disappears.
Social media amplifies humanity. Period. So its going to amplify the best and the worst more or less equally.
Nope. I am a gun owner but I am also all for better and more effective gun control.
I'll agree with you here. I was probably being a little too simplistic. Here's my main point. The way I see it, social media existing and being what it is enables bad things in people to come to light the same way that women existing and being what they are paves the way for rapists to come to light. But we would never (or at least should never) consider making the statement that women existing is part of cause of rape.
July 7, they reported 5 cases
I'm surprised it is as high as it is. Not many people live out here.
Hong Kong has 7.5 million people and 55 deaths. Shares an intimate land border with the original epicenter. Somehow they managed to not only control the virus, but have since still stayed relatively virus free. They had a recent spike, but the peak of that spike was 10 times lower per capita than our constant levels and is now 20 times lower after only 3 weeks.
Sure is considering who provides the data for Hong Kong. They're also only reporting 4634 dead in mainland China as well.
You mean to tell me that there isn’t a certain government official who has said all along that he doesn’t want the US numbers to be too high and pushed for lower testing and reporting our our cases? I seem to remember statements like “I’d rather have the people stay” offshore, he explained, “because I like the numbers being where they are. I don’t need to have the numbers double because of one ship.”
IBTL.....
