IFR Pop-up - Legality

WannFly

WannFly

Final Approach
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
6,553
Location
KLZU
Display Name
Display name:
Priyo
if you are just droning around , not on a IFR flight plan and things get smoky down below, you request for IFR pop-up , the question is would be be legal with out a flight plan? or should you file a plan in the air and then ask for pop up?


not asking for a friend
 
Sure hope so...did it hundreds of times. The book answer is that you should contact FSS and file in the air, but I was never asked to. Of course, 95% of my flying was on the laissez-faire west coast.

Bob Gardner
 
Completely legal, and before the ATC strike. available most anytime. Now it's a toss up. They might give you an IFR, or might not. Some approach controls and centers are more likely than others.
 
Interesting, I read on the inter web someone mentioned that their DPE during the checkride mentioned that you almost get it and ATC doesn’t care much. But if you bend anything FSDO will care since you didn’t follow the 1-2-3 rule (whatever that is) and didn’t file IFR before asking for a pop-up
 
WannFly said:
But if you bend anything FSDO will care since you didn’t follow the 1-2-3 rule (whatever that is) and didn’t file IFR before asking for a pop-up
Click to expand...

1-2-3 rule = One hour either side of your arrival time if the weather is not 2000' ceiling and 3 miles viz at the destination airport you need to file an alternate airport on your IFR flight plan.

Not sure it applies to the question since it's an IFR filing rule so you would have a flight plan (and weather does change enroute sometimes so I can't see them being hard over.)
 
If atc issues a clearance, you have that part covered as far as being legal even without a flight plan.
(although there are of course many other parts of process which could make you not legal)

They prefer to have a filed flight plan so if able do that first. (if you are in cell range, its easy enough to do, even airborne and I find easier than calling)
If asking for a popup (w/o a fltplan) have ready, written down, all the particulars of a suitable flight plan. I have heard several times, and was asked once by atc, to read my fltplan for the tapes - was told they do not enter it - they just want it recorded.'
If you have it written down you should be able to read it in less than 10 seconds thus not blocking the airwaves excessively. Read it at a good clip and get off is what they want.
 
What you have to do is maintain VFR rules until you receive a formal clearance. Cloud clearances altitudes the whole Shabang. In busier airspace sometimes you might have to wait a bit so if you are thinking you even might need it but note sure, doesn’t hurt to ask early.
 
WannFly said:
things get smoky down below
Click to expand...

That would be a not bad situation; in good vmc and wanting a clearance to below. One time it was 'just' vmc and the briefing said it was better in my planned direction so I did not file. Well there was no forecasting or reporting in between dep. point and 'better'.... shonuff' it got really crappy a few miles from the classC I left and there I was buzzing around down low with towers around and Approach could not accommodate my popup request. Very uncomfortable position. I had to call FSS and file, then get back to atc.
Many times now, I will file and not use it.
 
I never heard of "asking for a pop-up". I've always asked for an IFR clearance to do whatever. "Pop-up" was a term of art among controllers when they refer to guys like me surprising them with an impromptu IFR request, probably not a compliment either.
 
If you file first then it wouldn't be a pop-up. Filing before asking for a pop-up clearance is an oxymoron.
 
I think in 15 years of IFR flying, I've probably had only twice when ATC told me to go file when I asked for an IFR (pop up, if you will) clearance.
 
Let'sgoflying! said:
That would be a not bad situation; in good vmc and wanting a clearance to below. One time it was 'just' vmc and the briefing said it was better in my planned direction so I did not file. Well there was no forecasting or reporting in between dep. point and 'better'.... shonuff' it got really crappy a few miles from the classC I left and there I was buzzing around down low with towers around and Approach could not accommodate my popup request. Very uncomfortable position. I had to call FSS and file, then get back to atc.
Many times now, I will file and not use it.
Click to expand...
So I have taken taken off VFR with an IFR flight plan in place that was getting held on ground for a planes on approach. Held 10 min. Then held again for another 10. Then called back held again. I just took off VFR and opened in the air. Didn’t get my clearance for about 10 min and wasn’t IMC yet anyway.
So what if I stayed VFR flight rules for like an hour and opened up my flight plan, no issues here???
 
benyflyguy said:
So what if I stayed VFR flight rules for like an hour and opened up my flight plan, no issues here???
Click to expand...

If you fly that long without picking it up then you may be out of the sector that has the flight plan in my experience. I have had "who did you file that with, I can't find it".
Otherwise, ya if you stay vmc, you don't need a clearance.
 
Do this all the time... but the again, I live in the land of the 1 million TEC Routes..:cool:
 
benyflyguy said:
So I have taken taken off VFR with an IFR flight plan in place that was getting held on ground for a planes on approach. Held 10 min. Then held again for another 10. Then called back held again. I just took off VFR and opened in the air. Didn’t get my clearance for about 10 min and wasn’t IMC yet anyway.
So what if I stayed VFR flight rules for like an hour and opened up my flight plan, no issues here???
Click to expand...

Yeup that too...
 
Let'sgoflying! said:
If you fly that long without picking it up then you may be out of the sector that has the flight plan in my experience. I have had "who did you file that with, I can't find it".
Otherwise, ya if you stay vmc, you don't need a clearance.
Click to expand...

I file with an 800 number--they're rarely in the same state or even region. I've had enchanting conversations about Southern weather with briefers in ND and MN. One time I departed VFR towards inland weather and ILM would never answer my calls (tried about six times), but they had time to talk to VFR pilots flitting everywhere. So I called Seymour Johnson AFB and they were happy to open my flight plan just a few minutes before I reached the layer. Just one benefit of writing down radio frequencies before changing, as I had talked to them in the way in a few days before.
 
dmspilot said:
If you file first then it wouldn't be a pop-up. Filing before asking for a pop-up clearance is an oxymoron.
Click to expand...
Had a NY controller give me a hard time and ask me why I didn’t file when I needed to get a pop up for a quick approach because of unforecasted fog. WTFo_O. That’s the whole point of a pop up moron.
 
If you've previously filed (but not issued), I call it an air pickup rather than a pop-up. It works best if you can get to VFR to the minimum IFR altitude before your clearance is effective.

The key to air pickup (whether you file it by calling FSS on the radio or the phone or use some electronic means) is to make sure that the DEPARTURE point is something that is associated with the facility you're calling to get your clearance.
There was some initial fun-and-games with the SFRA where the FAA (not ATC, but the boneheads in DC) didn't understand how flight strip routing works. I remember sitting at Leesburg watching a video on how this was supposed to work where the guys tried to call Baltimore Approach over EMI to get their clearance (anybody who flies IFR regularly knew that it was ZNY airspace at the time). I'm not sure what the point of a video showing that nobody at the FAA had a freaking clue was supposed to instill with the general pilot and flight instructor population. The whole point of the "gates" in the current concept was to assure that the frequency you call is the one your plan was routed to.

Other than the two times I was told to go the FSS (once by Boston Center, which I guess wasn't too unexpected and once by Greensboro approach because he was just cranky, I guess), the funniest one was this on the way to Oshkosh a few years ago. We go up early (we help park the planes in Vintage), so here it's like Tuesday before the show and I'm getting VFR advisories from MKE approach. I'm checking the weather ahead...

27K: It looks like OSH is IFR. Can I get an IFR clearance from you? (implying the "or do I have to go file with FSS")
MKE: (sighs over the air, like... oh gee, it's starting already) Are you rated and equipped.
27K: affirmative.
MKE: Cleared direct OSHKOSH maintain 4000.
 
WannFly said:
if you are just droning around , not on a IFR flight plan and things get smoky down below, you request for IFR pop-up , the question is would be be legal with out a flight plan? or should you file a plan in the air and then ask for pop up?


not asking for a friend
Click to expand...

The question is if you are just out droning around and find the weather deteriorating, did you bother to get a preflight WX brief?
 
flyingron said:
the funniest one was this on the way to Oshkosh a few years ago. We go up early (we help park the planes in Vintage), so here it's like Tuesday before the show and I'm getting VFR advisories from MKE approach. I'm checking the weather ahead...

27K: It looks like OSH is IFR. Can I get an IFR clearance from you? (implying the "or do I have to go file with FSS")
MKE: (sighs over the air, like... oh gee, it's starting already) Are you rated and equipped.
27K: affirmative.
MKE: Cleared direct OSHKOSH maintain 4000.
Click to expand...

Reminds me of my first exposure to pop-up IFR clearances...

Me: Request VFR practice approach
ATC: Direct IAFIX, cleared for the Podunk RNAV 25 approach, maintain 3500 until established.
CFII: (is concerned about a cloud <2000ft laterally from IAFIX) Uh, can we turn that into an IFR clearance?
ATC: Cleared for the Podunk RNAV25 approach, direct IAFIX at 3500 IFR.
 
Clip4 said:
The question is if you are just out droning around and find the weather deteriorating, did you bother to get a preflight WX brief?
Click to expand...

well I found the scenario on the interweb, someone posted he was asked this during check ride. I am not even rated, if this happens to me, well... it will probably be a bad day
 
[QU
Clip4 said:
The question is if you are just out droning around and find the weather deteriorating, did you bother to get a preflight WX brief?
Click to expand...

Forecasts can be inaccurate. A few months ago the instructor and I were going to do some touch and goes in the pattern then go get some approaches done. It was vfr albiet a little low when we left the office. I preflighted, got atis and taxied up to the taxi way. Called for taxi clearance vfr and the controller tells us that the field had gone ifr. It wasn't supposed to do that for another couple hours. So we filed and did the approaches.
 
asicer said:
Reminds me of my first exposure to pop-up IFR clearances...

Me: Request VFR practice approach
ATC: Direct IAFIX, cleared for the Podunk RNAV 25 approach, maintain 3500 until established.
CFII: (is concerned about a cloud <2000ft laterally from IAFIX) Uh, can we turn that into an IFR clearance?
ATC: Cleared for the Podunk RNAV25 approach, direct IAFIX at 3500 IFR.
Click to expand...

The first clearance ATC gave was an IFR Clearance. Can't fault your CFII for verifying seeing as how you asked for a VFR practice approach. But that doesn't change the fact that the first one was an IFR clearance. Only question is, what was on the Controllers mind. Did he intend for it to be a VFR practice approach and fail to instruct you to maintain VFR which is absolutely required for the Controller to do. Or was he aware of the weather out there and just decided to give you the IFR clearance even though you had requested a VFR practice approach.
 
luvflyin said:
The first clearance ATC gave was an IFR Clearance. Can't fault your CFII for verifying seeing as how you asked for a VFR practice approach. But that doesn't change the fact that the first one was an IFR clearance. Only question is, what was on the Controllers mind. Did he intend for it to be a VFR practice approach and fail to instruct you to maintain VFR which is absolutely required for the Controller to do. Or was he aware of the weather out there and just decided to give you the IFR clearance even though you had requested a VFR practice approach.
Click to expand...
He might have said to maintain VFR. I doubt he knew the weather because it was just a few clouds here and there (I think... I was under the hood). I don't remember exactly because I was still in training.
 
Last edited:
asicer said:
He might have said to maintain VFR. I doubt he knew the weather because it was just a few clouds here and there (I think... I was under the hood). I don't remember exactly because I was still in training.
Click to expand...

Gotcha. I'd bet he probably did
 
luvflyin said:
Gotcha. I'd bet he probably did
Click to expand...

I would still check if I had VFR in my head when I asked for it. Around here my home airport bumps up against and is below a bravo. When practicing approaches VFR you have to hear "cleared into the Bravo" before you penetrate even if they are routing you there. Sometimes they forget.
 
PaulS said:
I would still check if I had VFR in my head when I asked for it. Around here my home airport bumps up against and is below a bravo. When practicing approaches VFR you have to hear "cleared into the Bravo" before you penetrate even if they are routing you there. Sometimes they forget.
Click to expand...

Yeah, there's that. Do they tell you to maintain VFR and 'clear' you for the Approach? Or do they say "maintain VFR, practice approach approved, no separation services provided."
 
luvflyin said:
Yeah, there's that. Do they tell you to maintain VFR and 'clear' you for the Approach? Or do they say "maintain VFR, practice approach approved, no separation services provided."
Click to expand...

Around here they almost always says maintain VFR throughout the practice approach when asked for practice
 
PaulS said:
[QU


Forecasts can be inaccurate. A few months ago the instructor and I were going to do some touch and goes in the pattern then go get some approaches done. It was vfr albiet a little low when we left the office. I preflighted, got atis and taxied up to the taxi way. Called for taxi clearance vfr and the controller tells us that the field had gone ifr. It wasn't supposed to do that for another couple hours. So we filed and did the approaches.
Click to expand...

At least you had a forecast and knew what the WX was expected to do. It is very seldom one is given a descent VFR that goes to crap while just flying locally around the area.
 
luvflyin said:
Yeah, there's that. Do they tell you to maintain VFR and 'clear' you for the Approach? Or do they say "maintain VFR, practice approach approved, no separation services provided."
Click to expand...
It's Boston Approach, they just say maintain vfr at all times. Then they say it again when clearing you for the approach. Generally they are pretty good about clearing you into the bravo if you get routed that far out, but sometimes they get busy and forget.
 
Clip4 said:
At least you had a forecast and knew what the WX was expected to do. It is very seldom one is given a descent VFR that goes to crap while just flying locally around the area.
Click to expand...

I hear you, that's true most of the time, although around here if you waited for a perfect forecast every time you wanted to fly you wouldn't fly much.
 
Can't get a pop-up in the SFRA. You are required to file on the ground, or air file with FSS prior to entering on a vfr clearance.
 
WannFly said:
Around here they almost always says maintain VFR throughout the practice approach when asked for practice
Click to expand...

They’re required to say “maintain VFR” everywhere for VFR IAPs. The difference is, if it’s the primary airport (most likely where TRACON is) they provide IFR separation services (minus 500 ft vertical) and actually clear you for the approach.

If it’s a secondary airport, they may (letter to airman) or may not provide IFR separation services. The later, you won’t get a clearance, and you’ll be informed of the lack of separation services
 
Last edited:
What's a VFR IAP?
And you've lost me. Primary vs. secondary doesn't change what separation services are available, only the class of airspace.
 
Velocity173 said:
They’re required to say “maintain VFR” everywhere for VFR IAPs. The difference is, if it’s the primary airport (most likely where TRACON is) they provide IFR separation services (minus 500 ft vertical) and actually clear you for the approach.

If it’s a secondary airport, they may (letter to airman) or may not provide IFR separation services. The later, you won’t get a clearance, and you’ll be informed of the lack of separation services
Click to expand...
I have done many practice approaches to a towered airport with the "practice approach approved (no separation services provided)" clearance, and approaches to nontowered airports where separation services were provided (until the frequency change). It's more about the preference of the local TRACON than whether the airport is towered or not.

Sounds like one of those, "I think every airport and Approach Control is the same as mine" posts.
 
flyingron said:
What's a VFR IAP?
And you've lost me. Primary vs. secondary doesn't change what separation services are available, only the class of airspace.
Click to expand...

A VFR aircraft conducting an instrument approach while while wearing a vision restriction device. For your second comment:


15C223A9-8745-4322-A73F-4A0361D60858.png
 
midlifeflyer said:
I have done many practice approaches to a towered airport with the "practice approach approved (no separation services provided)" clearance, and approaches to nontowered airports where separation services were provided (until the frequency change). It's more about the preference of the local TRACON than whether the airport is towered or not.

Sounds like one of those, "I think every airport and Approach Control is the same as mine" posts.
Click to expand...

“Primary airport.” Example: CLT TRACON (approach) provides IFR sep to VFRs conducting approaches to CLT. Outside of an LTA (I believe they have one) they don’t provide IFR sep to secondary airports. They try to provide it to as many possible but the one’s that are approved are listed on the LTA.

DF27E6E5-D75A-42BC-9386-D1A5453F49D1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Velocity173 said:
“Primary airport.” Example: CLT TRACON (approach) provides IFR sep to VFRs conducting approaches to CLT. Outside of an LTA (I believe they have one) they don’t provide IFR sep to secondary airports. They try to provide it to as many possible but the one’s that are approved are listed on the LTA.

View attachment 73652
Click to expand...
I don't think I disagreed with anything here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top