Maybe. Problem is the euphoric recall of the state of inebriation. That, and life’s myriad problems suggest once that switch is flicked it has to be dealt with going forward
recovery from addiction requires rigorous honesty and hard work. there are a number of redflags that suggest an absence of recovery. the question of whether he would need to report it. obviously yes. the idea that he would have tapered off but he couldnt miss work. the fact that he cites no...
do i need to report that i went to a medical facility for opiate addiction.
uh what do u think? no, of course not. why would u nees to report addiction to powerful drugs that is as recent as 18 months ago. why would the faa care about someone newly clean flying an airplane?
and u r worried...
what makes u think a psychiatrist wants the responsibility for approving someone for flight. These are judgement calls. What dr wants to have approved someone who intentionally crashes a plane.
Hauptman was a small time crook who used the kidnapping as an opportunity to get a ransom from lindbergh. they were innundated by people claiming to have the child. doesnt mean he kidnapped or killed the child.
I believe that is the main item the family wants to test with current science. he was a carpenter who never would have constructed such a shoddy ladder. they don’t believe the claims of the state police lab.
it’s a theory that makes sense for lots of reasons. almost certainly hauptman was innocent. his family is trying to get access to evidence to dna test.