What more do you need to know? Its a diversion program nothing more nothing less. Honestly it sounds like you're trying to get information out of me that is completely irrelevant.
Well from my understanding a diversion program isn't the same as a conviction either. Here is what I found: "PTI (pre-trial intervention) doesn't require the charge to be pled to prior to participation, thus there is never a conviction. In fact, successful completion of PTI results in the charge...
Judge referred me to this diversion program I had to do for a few months. In result the charge was "Noelle prossed" and in addition to that after that I got a letter saying that I was eligible to get my arrest expunged since I completed the diversion program. I sent in the paperwork and got a...
well agree to disagree you wanna believe that bs then you can. I never said it was off my record I was implying about the part about the conviction, but ok yes I was convicted even though like I said I didn't go to jail, was never on probation or didn't even paid a fine. Don't know how that...
And what point was proven other than my arrest being expunged was complete and utter nonsense and that I apparently have a conviction? Is that what you mean by "proving your point"?
You don't get it either do you? A lawyer never told me anything like that I was saying that I don't see how I was convicted when I didn't even serve no jail time, didn't pay a fine, nor was I put on probation. The judge never said anything like that to me either.
And to you I say this... I Don't see how I was convicted even though I didn't pay a fine or was put on probation, but you want to believe that too then go ahead