I've worked at a couple of schools that worked on the principle of overhauling the engine twice and then replacing with a factory new engine. I always thought this worked well and I can never remember any cracked crankcases.
Another school near to us used to overhaul indefinitely but after a...
The problem to me is the engine.
Having operated plenty of O-200 powerred aircraft and a few Rotax 912's the Rotax is without doubt the better engine. Its lighter runs on mogas with 10% ethanol and will last for ever.
Like the Cessna and the Skycatcher they put the wrong engine in it.
It's all about how much an hour you can make and if your a start up my vote goes to the PA28-140 and ideally with a 150HP
The O-200 in the C150 isn't robust enough. The exhaust valves stick and it's not possible to lean like a ***** in a training environment. When fitted with a metal prop the...
My 80HP Rotax did 5500 hours with the basic engine never missing a beat or sticking a valve.
When stripped had some wear on the camshaft but basically fine.
The O-235 is a better engine. O-200'S center main bearing doesn't last with metal props and the top end is weaker.
The weakness of the O-235 camshaft is vastly improved with diamond coated cam followers.
The flap lever system on the C150 has less microswitches and is therefore more reliable.